| 1 CA-JV 20-0137 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-12-22 |
—
|
Tara R. v. Dcs
|
|
… A written termination order must include specific findings of fact that support termination of parental rights. Ariz. R.P. Juv. Ct. 66(F)(2)(a). At a minimum, “the court must specify at least one factual finding sufficient to support each . …
|
| 1 CA-JV 20-0214 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-12-08 |
—
|
Desiree v. v. Dcs
|
|
… chael J. v. Ariz. Dep't of Econ. Sec., 196 Ariz. 246, 248-49, ¶¶ 11- 12 (2000). Termination of parental rights is generally not favored and "should be considered only as a last resort." Maricopa Cnty. Juv. Action No. JS–500274, 167 Ariz. 1, …
|
| 1 CA-JV 20-0159 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-12-01 |
—
|
Asaunte W. v. Dcs, N.W.
|
|
… unds. DISCUSSION ¶12 We review the termination of parental rights for an abuse of discretion. Titus S. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, 244 Ariz. 365, 369, ¶ 15 (App. 2018). This court will uphold the j …
|
| 1 CA-JV 20-0135 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-10-15 |
—
|
Aprilleann H. v. Dcs
|
|
… roof, “the court shall . . . [m]ake specific findings of fact in support of the termination of parental rights and grant the motion or petition for termination”); Ruben M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ. Sec., 230 Ariz. 236, 240, ¶ 24 (App. 2012) ( …
|
| 1 CA-JV 20-0123 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-10-15 |
—
|
Steven P., Ashley P. v. Dcs, A.P.
|
|
… Court DISCUSSION ¶17 We review the termination of parental rights for an abuse of discretion. Titus S. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, 244 Ariz. 365, 369, ¶ 15 (App. 2018). This court will uphold the j …
|
| 1 CA-JV 20-0050 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-10-06 |
—
|
Charles v. v. Dcs
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0337 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-09-29 |
—
|
Shea G. v. Dcs
|
|
… d acknowledged that the children complained about the placement. ¶46 Termination of parental rights is in a child’s best interests if the child will benefit from the termination or will be harmed if the relationship continues. Sh …
|
| 1 CA-JV 20-0147 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-09-29 |
—
|
Aaron B. v. Ashley H.
|
| 1 CA-JV 20-0024 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-09-10 |
—
|
Jerica S. v. Dcs, J.B.
|
|
… rests; she does not challenge the existence of statutory grounds for severance. Termination of parental rights is in a child’s best interests if the child would benefit from severance or be harmed by a denial of severance. Alma S. v. Dep’t …
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0336 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-08-27 |
—
|
Chelsea R. v. Dcs, H.R.
|
| 1 CA-JV 20-0006 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-08-25 |
—
|
Yvette L. v. Dcs
|
| 1 CA-JV 20-0009 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-08-13 |
—
|
Melissa S. v. Dcs
|
|
… aled. DISCUSSION ¶18 We review the termination of parental rights for an abuse of discretion. Titus S. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, 244 Ariz. 365, 369, ¶ 15 (App. 2018). This court will uphold the j …
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0420 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-08-13 |
—
|
Ashley C. v. Joseph B., H.B.
|
|
… . Ariz. Dept. of Econ. Sec., 196 Ariz. 246, 248-49, ¶¶ 11-12 (2000). Therefore, termination of parental rights is generally not favored and "should be considered only as a last resort." Maricopa Cty. Juv. Action No. JS-500274, 167 Ariz. 1, …
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0402 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-08-11 |
—
|
Jacob S. v. Dcs, A.F.
|
|
… 6-J, 133 Ariz. 157, 160 (1982). ¶15 We will not disturb the court’s termination of parental rights unless its factual findings are clearly erroneous—that is, unless no reasonable evidence exists to support them. Minh T. v. Ariz. …
|
| 1 CA-JV 20-0076 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-08-06 |
—
|
Brian H. v. MacArena H., I.H.
|
|
… [m]ake specific findings of fact in support of the termination of parental rights and grant the motion or petition for termination. In the minute entry following the severance hearing, the court …
|
| 1 CA-JV 20-0052 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-08-06 |
—
|
Gabriel A., Heather M. v. Dcs, G.A.
|
|
… chael J. v. Ariz. Dep't of Econ. Sec., 196 Ariz. 246, 248-49, ¶¶ 11- 12 (2000). Termination of parental rights is generally not favored and "should be considered only as a last resort." Maricopa Cty. Juv. Action No. JS–500274, 167 Ariz. 1, …
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0253 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-07-28 |
—
|
Jessica P. v. Dcs, H.P.
|
|
… nable to meet his or her child’s needs,” but while the ADA “is not a defense to termination of parental rights, it applies to the provision of assessments, treatment, and other services that the Department makes available to parents . . . b …
|
| 1 CA-JV 20-0039 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-07-28 |
—
|
Richard R. v. Daisy A., I.R.
|
|
… tion is otherwise legally possible and likely, a [superior] court may find that termination of parental rights, so as to permit adoption, is in the child’s best interests.” See Demetrius L., 239 Ariz. at 4, ¶ 12 (emphasis added). …
|
| 1 CA-JV 20-0089 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-07-16 |
—
|
Logan M. v. Dcs, J.M.
|
|
… 04. DISCUSSION ¶6 To support the termination of parental rights, DCS must prove at least one statutory ground for termination by clear and convincing evidence. Kent K. v. Bobby M., 210 Ariz. 27 …
|
| 1 CA-JV 20-0080 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-07-09 |
—
|
Jasmine H. v. Brian H., B.H.
|
|
… . Decision of the Court ¶6 We review the termination of parental rights for an abuse of discretion. Mary Lou C. v. Ariz. Dep’t Econ. Sec., 207 Ariz. 43, 47, ¶ 8 (App. 2004). As the trier of fact, the j …
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0385 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-06-30 |
—
|
Lindy S. v. Dcs
|
|
… aled. DISCUSSION ¶10 We review the termination of parental rights for an abuse of discretion. Titus S. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, 244 Ariz. 365, 369, ¶ 15 (App. 2018). This court will uphold the j …
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0382 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-06-16 |
—
|
Fernando G. v. Dcs, L.G.
|
|
… 66–J, 133 Ariz. 157, 160 (1982). ¶11 We will not disturb the court’s termination of parental rights unless the factual findings are clearly erroneous—that is, unless no reasonable evidence exists to support them. See Minh T. v. A …
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0150 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-06-02 |
—
|
Emily B., Andrew D. v. Dcs
|
|
… r parental rights based on prolonged substance abuse. This court can affirm the termination of parental rights on any single statutory ground, and upon doing so, does not need to address other grounds on which the juvenile court ruled. Mich …
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0338 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-05-12 |
—
|
Matthew C. v. Dcs, M.C.
|
|
… nonetheless fundamental. Michael J., 196 Ariz. at 248-49, ¶¶ 11-12. Therefore, termination of parental rights is generally not favored and "should be considered only as a last resort." Maricopa Cty. Juv. Action No. JS–500274, 167 Ariz. 1, …
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0262 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-04-30 |
—
|
Dcs v. Deshannon B., D.B.
|
|
… o reestablish a relationship may nonetheless be relevant to determining whether termination of parental rights is in a child’s best interests. See JS-500274, 167 Ariz. at 8. 7 …
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0305 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-04-21 |
—
|
Morgan F. v. Dcs, D.F.
|
|
… ives. The record supports the court’s finding that “the child is adoptable” and termination of parental rights was in Child’s best interest. In making its findings, the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion, nor were its findings erro …
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0311 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-04-07 |
—
|
Byron v. Dcs
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0308 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-03-24 |
—
|
Jose v. Dcs
|
|
… terests finding, the finding is supported in the record. In considering whether termination of parental rights is appropriate, the superior court must find termination is in the Children’s best interests by a preponderance of the evidence. …
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0234 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-03-17 |
—
|
Salynda H., Paul T. v. Dcs
|
|
… oblems involving mental illness and substance abuse. ... Termination of parental rights will make the [C]hildren available for adoption so they can benefit from a safe, stable forever home. ¶20 …
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0365 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-03-17 |
—
|
Julian D. v. McKenzi W., M.D.
|
| CV-19-0057-PR |
Ariz. |
2020-03-11 |
—
|
Sandra R./sergio C. v. dcs/m.R./f.M./j.M.
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0087 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-02-27 |
—
|
Rodney L., Deana L. v. Dcs, J.L.
|
|
… t’s best interests finding. We disagree. ¶43 In considering whether termination of parental rights is appropriate, the superior court must find termination is in the Children’s best interests by a preponderance of the evidence. …
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0269 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-02-27 |
—
|
Adam W. v. Tori F., T.W.
|
|
… pports the finding that termination was in T.W.’s best interests. We review the termination of parental rights for an abuse of 2 ADAM W. v. TORI F., T.W. …
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0153 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-02-18 |
—
|
Gladesa A. v. Dcs, N.A.
|
|
… rts to provide reunification services. We will not disturb the superior court’s termination of parental rights unless the court’s factual findings are clearly erroneous—that is, unless no reasonable evidence exists to support them. See Minh …
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0252 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-02-11 |
—
|
Rene T. v. Cynthia C.
|
|
… support the court’s best interests finding. We disagree. In considering whether termination of parental rights is appropriate, the superior court must find termination is in the children’s best interests by a preponderance of the evidence. …
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0130 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-02-04 |
—
|
Jessi N., Ryan J. v. Dcs
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0204 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-01-23 |
—
|
Dawn S. v. Dcs
|
|
… Decision of the Court We will not disturb the court’s termination of parental rights unless the factual findings are clearly erroneous—that is, unless no reasonable evidence exists to support them. See Minh T. v. A …
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0185 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-01-16 |
—
|
Yessica R., Efrain R. v. Dcs
|
| 1 CA-CR 19-0137 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2020-01-14 |
—
|
Shad C. v. Dcs, J.C.
|
|
… ’s Finding That Severance Was In Child’s Best Interests. ¶23 Termination of parental rights is in a child’s best interests if the juvenile court finds “the child would benefit from a severance or be harmed by the continua …
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0203 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2019-12-26 |
—
|
Samantha A. v. Dcs
|
|
… istinct from those of the parent. Kent K., 210 Ariz. at 285, ¶ 31. To find that termination of parental rights is in a child’s best interests, the superior court must conclude, based on the totality of the circumstances, that the …
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0209 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2019-12-17 |
—
|
Shaquita H. v. Dcs, A.B.
|
|
… he law on the same subject must be given effect, if possible.”). ¶16 Termination of parental rights based on chronic substance abuse under § 8-533(B)(3) requires “a history of chronic abuse of dangerous drugs . . . [and] reasonab …
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0264 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2019-12-12 |
—
|
Ricky G. v. Priscilla G., A.G.
|
|
… er A.R.S. § 8-536(A), which provides in relevant part that, when a petition for termination of parental rights is filed, the court must order a social study. But the court may waive this requirement if it is in child’s best interests. A.R.S …
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0073 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2019-11-14 |
—
|
Jessie D. v. Dcs
|
|
… 3(A). DISCUSSION ¶4 To support the termination of parental rights, DCS must prove at least one statutory ground for termination by clear and convincing evidence. A.R.S. § 8-537(B); Kent K. v. Bob …
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0146 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2019-10-17 |
—
|
Trung N. v. Dcs, J.C.
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0149 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2019-10-17 |
—
|
Rachael A. v. Dcs
|
|
… 03(A). DISCUSSION ¶5 To support the termination of parental rights, DCS must prove at least one or more statutory ground for termination by clear and convincing evidence. A.R.S. § 8-537(B); Kent K …
|
| 1 CA-JV 18-0503 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2019-09-24 |
—
|
Samantha D. v. Dcs
|
|
… . I. Termination Ground ¶9 Section 8-533(B)(3) provides for termination of parental rights when “the parent is unable to discharge parental responsibilities because of . . . a history of chronic abuse of dangerous drugs, …
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0111 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2019-09-24 |
—
|
Michael M. v. Anita P., M.M.
|
|
… nally requires the court to “[m]ake specific findings of fact in support of the termination of parental rights.” This court has interpreted Rule 66(F)(2)(a) to require that the court specify at least one factual finding sufficient to suppor …
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0067 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2019-09-05 |
—
|
Marcellina D. v. Dcs, A.D.
|
|
… court’s finding that termination was in A.D.’s best interests. ¶9 Termination of parental rights requires clear and convincing evidence of a statutory ground set forth in A.R.S. § 8-533(B) and proof by a preponderance of the e …
|
| CV-18-0178-PR |
Ariz. |
2019-08-15 |
—
|
Trisha A. v. Department of Child safety/l.A./l.A.
|
|
… a child's need for timely permanency. Moreover, once a court finds grounds for termination of parental rights, the interests of the child and the parent diverge, which is why the children in this case were assigned a guardian ad litem. See …
|
| 1 CA-JV 19-0031 |
Ariz. Ct. App. |
2019-08-08 |
—
|
Amber M. v. Dcs
|
|
… at ¶ 37, but it is not required to wait an indefinite period before requesting termination of parental rights, Maricopa Cty. Juv. Action No. JS-501568, 177 Ariz. 571, 577 (App. 1994). Nor is DCS required to provide services that would be f …
|