Court rule
Ariz. R. Civ. App. P.
Ariz. R. Civ. App. P. 29
Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure.
Opinions citing this rule
| Docket | Court | Filed | Disposition | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 CA-CV 25-0219 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 2026-01-09 | Affirmed in part; reversed in part | PETERSEN v. FONTES |
| 1 CA-CV 16-0012-FC | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 2016-06-09 | Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded | Smith v. Smith |
| 1 CA-CV 10-0726 A | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 2011-05-26 | — | Mangan v. Mangan |
| 1 CA-MH 09-0048 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 2010-05-14 | — | In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx |
| No. 1 CA-MH 09-0048 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 2010-02-25 | — | In re MH 2009-001264 |
| 1 CA-MH 06-0015 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 2007-02-13 | — | In re MH 2006-000749 |
| 2 CA-CV 2002-0064 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 2002-06-11 | Vacated in part, affirmed in part | Kromko v. City of Tucson |
| CV-97-0166-PR/A | Ariz. | 1997-12-24 | Remanded | Schwichtenberg v. State |
| CV-96-0250-PR | Ariz. | 1996-10-24 | Vacated | Postal Instant Press, Inc. v. Corral Restaurants, Inc. |