Court rule
Ariz. R. Civ. App. P.
Ariz. R. Civ. App. P. 8
Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure.
Includes: Ariz. R. Civ. App. P. 8.1 · Ariz. R. Civ. App. P. 8.1(c) · Ariz. R. Civ. App. P. 8.1(h)
Opinions citing this rule
| Docket | Court | Filed | Disposition | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 CA-CV 2011-0012 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 2012-02-28 | Dismissed | Santee v. Mesa Airlines, Inc. America West Airlines, Inc. |
| CV-10-0205-AP/EL | Ariz. | 2010-09-02 | Affirmed | McLaughlin v. Bennett |
| CV-10-0183-AP/EL | Ariz. | 2010-08-06 | Affirmed | McClung v. Bennett |
| 1 CA-CV 09-0202, 1 CA-CV 09-0203 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 2010-02-25 | Affirmed | Riendeau v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. |
| 2 CA-CV 2009-0046 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 2010-02-10 | Affirmed in part | Bennett James L. Bennett Money Purchase Pension Plan Meyerstein v. Baxter Group |
| 2 CA-CV 2008-0189 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 2009-04-02 | Reversed and remanded | Fidelity National Title v. Town of Marana Bronson Nessinger |
| 1 CA-CV 08-0225 EL, 1 CA-CV 08-0499 EL | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 2009-03-26 | — | Jones v. Paniagua |
| 1 CA-CV 07-0640, 1 CA-CV 07-0671 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 2008-12-04 | — | Backus v. State |
| 1 CA-CV 07-0454, 1 CA-CV 07-0801 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 2008-11-28 | — | Havasupai Tribe of the Havasupai Reservation v. Arizona Board of Regents |
| CV-08-0275-AP/EL | Ariz. | 2008-11-18 | Affirmed | TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE MOVING ARIZONA'S ECONOMY v. Brewer |
| CV-08-0199-AP/EL | Ariz. | 2008-08-22 | Reversed | Bee v. Day |
| CV-08-0208-AP/EL | Ariz. | 2008-08-19 | Affirmed | Jenkins v. Hale |
| 2 CA-CV 2006-0124 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 2007-05-31 | — | Burkhamer v. State of Arizona |
| CV-02-0190-PR, CV-02-0218-PR, CV-02-0220-PR | Ariz. | 2003-08-21 | Remanded | Scottsdale Healthcare, Inc. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administration |
| 2 CA-CV 2002-0092 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 2003-03-17 | Affirmed | Property Located at 6757 S. Burcham Ave. |
| 1 CA-CV 01-0262 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 2002-05-30 | — | Harvest v. Craig |
| CV-97-0409-PR | Ariz. | 1999-03-09 | — | Hill v. City of Phoenix |
| CV-98-0012-PR | Ariz. | 1998-12-15 | Vacated | Boydston v. Strole Development Co. |
| 1 CA-CV 97-0008 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 1997-08-05 | — | Hill v. Maricopa County |
| 2 CA-CV 95-0185 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 1996-10-31 | — | Duke v. Cochise County |
| 2CA-CV95-0251 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 1996-05-28 | Dismissed | In re 1988 Chevrolet ½ PU, VIN |
| 1 CA-CV 95-0486, 1 CA-SA 96-0019 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 1996-03-07 | — | Homebuilders Ass'n of Central Arizona v. City of Scottsdale |
| 1 CA-CV 94-0325 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 1995-12-05 | Remanded | Mayer v. State |
| CR-94-0155-PR, CR-94-0326-PR | Ariz. | 1995-06-29 | — | State v. Portillo |
| CV-93-0342-PR | Ariz. | 1994-11-29 | Reversed | Watts v. Industrial Commission |
| 1 CA-CV 92-0094 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 1992-06-23 | — | Wilkinson v. Fabry |
| 1 CA-CV 90-322 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 1991-11-21 | Affirmed | Bird v. State Through Corbin |
| 1 CA-CV 89-633 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 1991-11-12 | Remanded | Rourk v. State |
| 1 CA-CV 88-507 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 1990-08-16 | Dismissed | Jenkins v. First Baptist Church |
| 2 CA-CV 88-0139 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 1989-09-06 | — | Lightning "A" Ranch Venture v. Tankersley |
| No. 2 CA-CV 88-0139 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 1989-06-20 | — | Lightning "A" Ranch Venture v. Tankersley |
| 1 CA-CIV 9050 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 1987-10-08 | — | Maricopa County Health Department v. Harmon |
| 1 CA-CIV 6431 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 1984-11-15 | Affirmed | Wendling v. Southwest Savings & Loan Ass'n |
| 1 CA-CIV 6427 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 1984-09-04 | Affirmed | Arizona Management Corp. v. Kallof |
| 1 CA-JUV 220 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 1984-04-19 | Affirmed | In Re the Appeal in Yuma County, Juvenile Action Nos. J-81-339 & J-81-340 |
| 16083-PR | Ariz. | 1982-10-08 | — | McHazlett v. Otis Engineering Corp. |
| 1 CA-CIV 4418 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 1978-11-14 | — | Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Hall |