Court rule
Ariz. R.P. Spec. Act.
Ariz. R.P. Spec. Act. 3
Arizona Rules of Procedure for Special Actions.
Opinions citing this rule
| Docket | Court | Filed | Disposition | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 CA-SA 2007-0067 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 2007-09-07 | — | State v. Fell |
| 2 CA-SA 2007-0054 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 2007-08-09 | Vacated | Andrew G. v. Peasley-Fimbres |
| 2 CA-SA 2007-0012 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 2007-04-19 | Vacated | Scott Douglas Nordstrom v. State of Arizona |
| 2 CA-SA 2006-0101 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 2007-02-08 | — | Grace Howard Allen v. Ades and T.S.A. |
| 2 CA-SA 2006-0083 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 2006-12-27 | Granted | State v. Campoy |
| 2 CA-SA 2006-0085 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 2006-12-19 | Granted | Edward P. Bolding v. State of Arizona |
| 2 CA-CV 2006-0033 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 2006-12-15 | — | GRAND v. NACCHIO McMASTER And QWEST COMMUNICATIONS |
| 2 CA-SA 2006-0075 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 2006-12-07 | Granted | Smith v. Mitchell |
| 2 CA-SA 2006-0070 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 2006-11-06 | — | Yarbrough v. Montoya-Paez |
| 2 CA-SA 2006-0056 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 2006-09-14 | Granted | Scott Douglas Nordstrom v. State of Arizona |
| CV-06-0079-SA | Ariz. | 2006-09-12 | — | Forty-Seventh Legislature v. Napolitano |
| 2 CA-SA 2006-0006 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 2006-06-02 | — | Sonoran Desert Investigations, Inc. v. Miller |
| 2 CA-SA 2005-0080 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 2006-04-28 | — | Roubos v. City of Tucson |
| 2 CA-SA 2005-0102 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 2006-01-30 | Reversed | FRED MILLER M.D., Et Ux. v. LUZ BARRERA, MUTUAL INSURANCE CO |
| 1 CA-SA 05-0112 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 2005-08-30 | — | Snyder v. Donato |
| 2 CA-SA 2005-0011 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 2005-06-22 | — | State v. Brown |
| 1 CA-CV 04-0268 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 2005-05-12 | — | Primary Consultants, L.L.C. v. Maricopa County Recorder |
| 2 CA-SA 2005-0001 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 2005-05-10 | — | Renee Antonio Fragoso v. State |
| 2 CA-SA 2004-0057 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 2004-09-23 | — | State v. Fell |
| 2 CA-SA 2004-0017 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 2004-06-03 | — | Medders v. Conlogue |
| CV-02-0330-SA | Ariz. | 2003-03-27 | Affirmed | Nielson v. Patterson |
| CV-01-0262-PR | Ariz. | 2003-02-18 | Granted | Twin City Fire Insurance v. Burke |
| 1 CA-SA 01-0168 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 2002-02-21 | — | Blake v. Schwartz |
| 1 CA-SA 01-0290 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 2002-02-12 | Vacated | Romley v. Schneider |
| CV-00-0242-PR | Ariz. | 2001-08-29 | — | Arizona Department of Revenue v. Dougherty |
| CV-97-0448-PR. | Ariz. | 1999-05-19 | — | Southern California Edison Co. v. Peabody Western Coal Co. |
| 2 CA-CV 97-0224 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 1998-07-30 | Affirmed in part | Tire Shredders, Inc. v. Pima County |
| 2 CA-SA 93-0096 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 | 1993-08-26 | Remanded | Jones v. Buchanan |
| CV-92-0165-PR | Ariz. | 1993-05-20 | — | Sanchez v. Coxon |
| 1 CA-SA 92-0298 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 1993-04-22 | Granted | Yuma Regional Medical Center v. Superior Court |
| SB-91-0028-D | Ariz. | 1993-02-18 | — | Matter of Levine |
| CV-92-0224-PR | Ariz. | 1992-10-08 | — | Hedlund v. Sheldon |
| WC-90-0001-IR | Ariz. | 1992-03-19 | — | In Re the Rights Ex Rel. Gila River |
| 1 CA-CV 90-106 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 1991-01-15 | Remanded | Rose v. Arizona Department of Corrections |
| CV-89-0186-SA | Ariz. | 1990-03-30 | — | Fain Land & Cattle Co. v. Hassell |
| 1 CA-SA 136 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 1987-04-28 | — | State ex rel. Corbin v. Superior Court |
| CV-86-0165-SA | Ariz. | 1986-09-17 | — | Del E. Webb v. Superior Court of Arizona |
| CV-86-0099-SA | Ariz. | 1986-07-17 | Remanded | La Raia v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. |
| 18548-SA | Ariz. | 1986-06-24 | — | Bishop v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN & FOR PIMA CTY. |
| 1 CA-CIV 4437 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 1980-09-23 | Modified | St. Johns Irrigation & Ditch Co. v. Arizona Water Commission |