Per curiam
Procedural
Per curiam
Unsigned opinion of the court.
| Docket | Court | Filed | Disposition | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Civil No. 510 | Ariz. | 1896-05-04 | — | Miller v. Webb |
| Civil No. 521 | Ariz. | 1896-05-04 | — | Burtis v. Faulkner |
| Civil No. 494 | Ariz. | 1896-05-04 | — | Bauer v. Wagner |
| Criminal No. 109 | Ariz. | 1896-01-24 | — | Lares v. Territory of Arizona |
| Civil No. 511 | Ariz. | 1896-01-22 | — | Otis v. City of Prescott |
| Civil No. 459 | Ariz. | 1896-01-22 | — | Watton v. Cottrell |
| Civil No. 428 | Ariz. | 1896-01-21 | — | Arnold Gold & Silver Mining Co. v. Cowan |
| Civil No. 499 | Ariz. | 1896-01-21 | — | Bryan v. Cochise County |
| Civil No. 497 | Ariz. | 1896-01-21 | — | Gactjeus v. Henderson |
| Civil No. 455 | Ariz. | 1896-01-20 | — | Linn v. Gila Bend Reservoir & Irrigation Co. |
| Civil No. 458 | Ariz. | 1896-01-20 | — | Satterwhite v. Pima County |
| Civil No. 498 | Ariz. | 1896-01-18 | — | Williams v. Cochise County |
| Civil No. 516 | Ariz. | 1896-01-18 | — | County of Cochise v. Board of Supervisors |
| Criminal No. 95 | Ariz. | 1896-01-18 | — | Wissinger v. Territory of Arizona |
| Criminal No. 110 | Ariz. | 1896-01-18 | — | Booth v. Territory of Arizona |
| Civil No. 529 | Ariz. | 1896-01-18 | — | Luke v. Allen |
| Civil No. 525 | Ariz. | 1896-01-16 | — | Ohuick v. Sherman |
| Civil No. 524 | Ariz. | 1896-01-16 | — | Hancock v. Pemberton |
| Civil No. 390 | Ariz. | 1895-07-31 | — | Cohn v. Mehan |
| Civil No. 484 | Ariz. | 1895-07-31 | — | Cañada Del Oro Mines Ltd. v. Miltenberg |
| Civil No. 461 | Ariz. | 1895-07-30 | — | Marks v. San Francisco Breweries Co. |
| Civil No. 468 | Ariz. | 1895-07-15 | — | Atlantic & Pacific Railroad v. Defiance Cattle Co. |
| Civil No. 478 | Ariz. | 1895-07-13 | — | Miranda v. Goldman |
| Criminal No. 107 | Ariz. | 1895-07-13 | — | Escarosa v. United States |
| Civil No. 493 | Ariz. | 1895-07-12 | — | Osborn v. Central Avenue Driving Ass'n |
| Civil No. 491 | Ariz. | 1895-07-12 | — | Bowen v. Bank of British Columbia |
| Civil No. 480 | Ariz. | 1895-07-11 | — | Rigdon v. Cottrell |
| Civil No. 492 | Ariz. | 1895-07-11 | — | Tooker v. Virginia Gold Mining Co. |
| Civil No. 441 | Ariz. | 1895-07-10 | — | Cook v. Gila County |
| Civil No. 467 | Ariz. | 1895-07-10 | — | Ryder v. Rixon |
| Civil No. 446 | Ariz. | 1895-07-10 | — | Daggs v. McCrum |
| Civil No. 462 | Ariz. | 1895-07-10 | — | Brecht v. San Francisco Breweries Co. |
| Civil No. 489 | Ariz. | 1895-07-10 | — | Reymert v. Johnson |
| Civil No. 466 | Ariz. | 1895-07-10 | — | Scott v. County of Pima |
| Civil No. 343 | Ariz. | 1895-07-10 | — | Estate of Walker v. Doran |
| Civil No. 490 | Ariz. | 1895-07-09 | — | Peters v. Phœnix National Bank |
| Civil No. 389 | Ariz. | 1895-02-23 | — | Kinnear v. Kinnear |
| Civil Nos. 421, 422 | Ariz. | 1895-02-23 | — | Silver King Mining Co. v. Brown |
| Civil No. 435 | Ariz. | 1895-02-23 | — | Bennitt v. Perley |
| Civil No. 440 | Ariz. | 1895-02-23 | — | Gila County v. Thompson |
| Civil No. 442 | Ariz. | 1895-02-23 | — | Duke v. Ferguson |
| Civil No. 451 | Ariz. | 1895-02-23 | — | United Verde Copper Co. v. Oliver |
| Civil No. 460 | Ariz. | 1895-02-23 | — | Jones v. Murphy |
| Civil No. 447 | Ariz. | 1895-02-23 | — | Scribner v. County of Cochise |
| Civil No. 448 | Ariz. | 1895-01-31 | — | Wilson v. Lowry |
| Criminal No. 103 | Ariz. | 1895-01-28 | — | Steinbrook v. Territory of Arizona |
| Civil No. 407 | Ariz. | 1894-01-30 | — | Santa Fe, Prescott, & Phœnix Railway Co. v. Fishes |
| Civil No. 423 | Ariz. | 1894-01-29 | — | Carroll v. Goodwin |
| Civil No. 412 | Ariz. | 1894-01-29 | — | Florence Canal Co. v. Davis |
| Civil No. 408 | Ariz. | 1894-01-23 | — | McGinness v. McGinness |