Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc., 511 P.2d 699.

41 citing documents.

Perez v. Circle K Ariz. 2025
Perez v. Circle K Ariz. 2025
“The law is clear in Arizona that a proprietor of a business is under an affirmative duty to make the premises reasonably safe for use by invitees.” Tribe, 133 Ariz. at 519; see also Chiara v. Fry’s Food Stores of Ariz., Inc., Nicoletti, 131 Ariz. at 143; Preuss v. Sambo’s of Ariz., Inc., Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.
Perez v. Circle K Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Perez v. Circle K Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶21 Citing Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., and Andrews v. Fry’s Food Stores of Ariz., Perez argues the superior court erred because reasonable people could differ as to whether Circle K created an unreasonably dangerous condition or an “open and obvious danger.” The procedural posture of both cases
Rucker v. Quiktrip Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Rucker v. Quiktrip Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
Gillis v. Northsand Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Gillis v. Northsand Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
and later adopted in Preuss, 5 GILLIS v. NORTHSAND, et al. Decision of the Court [T]he general proposition [is] that in order to impose liability on the proprietor for injuries
Warford v. 99 Cents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Warford v. 99 Cents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
Ager v. a Better Today Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Ager v. a Better Today Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., Preuss v. Sambo’s of Ariz., Inc., Andrews v. Fry’s Food Stores of Ariz., Restatement (Second) of Torts § 343, cmt.
Shaver v. Circle K Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Shaver v. Circle K Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Pruess v. Sambo’s of Ariz. Inc., Andrews v. Fry’s Food Stores of Ariz., see Restatement (Second) of Torts § 343, comment d (negligence is the failure to warn of or correct an unreasonably dangerous condition).
Grafitti-Valenzuela v. City of Phoenix 167 P.3d 711 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Grafitti-Valenzuela v. City of Phoenix 167 P.3d 711 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.
David Contreras, Sr. v. Walgreens Drug Store 3837 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
David Contreras, Sr. v. Walgreens Drug Store 3837 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Constructive notice is shown by proof “‘the condition existed for such a length of time that in the exercise of ordinary care the proprietor should have known of it and taken action to remedy it.’” Chiara, 152 Ariz. at 400, 733 P.3d at 285, quoting Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
Haynes v. Syntek Finance Corp. 909 P.2d 399 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Haynes v. Syntek Finance Corp. 909 P.2d 399 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Borota v. University Medical Center 861 P.2d 679 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Borota v. University Medical Center 861 P.2d 679 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Chiara v. Fry’s Food Stores of Arizona, Inc., , , Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
Cooley v. Arizona Public Service Co. 839 P.2d 422 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Dulles v. Safeway Stores, Inc. 810 P.2d 627 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Dulles v. Safeway Stores, Inc. 810 P.2d 627 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
McGuire, supra; Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.
Chiara v. Fry's Food Stores of Arizona, Inc. 733 P.2d 283 Ariz. 1987
Chiara v. Fry's Food Stores of Arizona, Inc. 733 P.2d 283 Ariz. 1987
Id.; Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
Preuss v. Sambo's of Arizona, Inc. 635 P.2d 1210 Ariz. 1981
Preuss v. Sambo's of Arizona, Inc. 635 P.2d 1210 Ariz. 1981
Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
Bloom v. Fry's Food Stores, Inc. 636 P.2d 1229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Bloom v. Fry's Food Stores, Inc. 636 P.2d 1229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.
Tom v. SS Kresge Co., Inc. 633 P.2d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Tom v. SS Kresge Co., Inc. 633 P.2d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Co., , Berne v. Greyhound Parks of Arizona, Inc.
Jackson v. Cartwright School District 607 P.2d 975 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Jackson v. Cartwright School District 607 P.2d 975 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
In Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., , we stated: There is, however, the general proposition that in order to impose liability on the proprietor for injuries sustained by an invitee, the plaintiff must prove either, 1) that the foreign substance or dangerous condition is the result of defendant’s acts or the acts of his servants
Parness v. City of Tempe 600 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Parness v. City of Tempe 600 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Walker v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc.
George v. Fox West Coast Theatres 519 P.2d 185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
George v. Fox West Coast Theatres 519 P.2d 185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc., , Compton v. National Metals Company, 10 Ariz.App.
Delarosa v. State 518 P.2d 582 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
Delarosa v. State 518 P.2d 582 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
Walker v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc.