Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Chambers v. United Farm Workers Organizing Committee, 541 P.2d 567.

58 citing documents.

Williams v. ades/lamont Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Williams v. ades/lamont Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Comm., AFL-CIO, (emphasis added); Armory Park Neighborhood Ass’n v. Episcopal Cmty.
Davey v. Roberts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Davey v. Roberts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Comm., AFL-CIO, (internal quotation omitted).
Lallande v. Penzone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Lallande v. Penzone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Comm., AFL-CIO, (noting that mootness prohibits giving opinions concerning issues that no longer exist due to a change in factual circumstances).
Lattimer v. Brisbon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Lattimer v. Brisbon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Red Mountain v. Ingle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Red Mountain v. Ingle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Arizona Cannabis Nurses Ass'n v. Arizona Department of Health Services 392 P.3d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Arizona Cannabis Nurses Ass'n v. Arizona Department of Health Services 392 P.3d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Comm., AFL-CIO, , (“[a] court’s ruling which is favorable to a party may not be appealed by that party”).
Petrocelli v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Petrocelli v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Comm., AFL-CIO, (stating that “mere dissatisfaction” with the result of a judgment is insufficient to constitute aggrievement for jurisdictional purposes).
Sabatina v. Cook Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sabatina v. Cook Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Boser v. Ware Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Boser v. Ware Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Comm., AFL– CIO, (); ¶ 6 (App. 2014); Farmers Ins.
Russell Piccoli v. O'Donnell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Russell Piccoli v. O'Donnell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Comm., AFL-CIO, ( RUSSELL PICCOLI v. O’DONNELL Decision of the Court 556, )
Kondaur Capital Corp. v. Pinal County 330 P.3d 379 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Kondaur Capital Corp. v. Pinal County 330 P.3d 379 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
App. P. 1; (“court’s ruling which is favorable to a party may not be appealed by that party”); Farmers Ins.
Douglas v. Governing Board of Window Rock Consolidated School District No. 8 210 P.3d 1275 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Douglas v. Governing Board of Window Rock Consolidated School District No. 8 210 P.3d 1275 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Comm., , (“‘Standing’ focuses on the parties and requires that each party possess an interest in the outcome of the litigation.”); Farmers Ins.
Flores v. Cooper Tire and Rubber Co. 178 P.3d 1176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Flores v. Cooper Tire and Rubber Co. 178 P.3d 1176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Moedt v. General Motors Corp. 60 P.3d 240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Moedt v. General Motors Corp. 60 P.3d 240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Comm., , (“ ‘Standing’ focuses on the parties and requires that each party possess an interest in the outcome of the litigation.”).
Valler v. Lee 949 P.2d 51 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Valler v. Lee 949 P.2d 51 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Ayres v. Red Cloud Mills, Ltd. 808 P.2d 1226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Ayres v. Red Cloud Mills, Ltd. 808 P.2d 1226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
This court has previously explained that standing “focuses on the parties and requires that each party possess an interest in the outcome of the litigation.”
State v. Peruskov 800 P.2d 15 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Peruskov 800 P.2d 15 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Grim v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. 740 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Grim v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. 740 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Trus Joist Corp. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 735 P.2d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Trus Joist Corp. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 735 P.2d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Id.; Chambers v. United Farm Worker’s Organizing Committee, P.2d 567 (1975).
Greenwood v. Peterson 717 P.2d 892 Ariz. 1986
Matter of Strobel 717 P.2d 892 Ariz. 1986
Greenwood v. Peterson 717 P.2d 892 Ariz. 1986
Matter of Bal-comb’s Estate
Matter of Strobel 717 P.2d 892 Ariz. 1986
Armory Park Neighborhood Ass'n v. Episcopal Community Services 712 P.2d 914 Ariz. 1985
Armory Park Neighborhood Ass'n v. Episcopal Community Services 712 P.2d 914 Ariz. 1985
Chambers v. United Farm Workers Organizing Committee, AFL-CIO
In Re the Appeal in Pima County, Juvenile Action No. B-9385 674 P.2d 845 Ariz. 1983
In Re the Appeal in Pima County, Juvenile Action No. B-9385 674 P.2d 845 Ariz. 1983
Truck Insurance Exchange v. State Compensation Fund 673 P.2d 314 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Truck Insurance Exchange v. State Compensation Fund 673 P.2d 314 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
ASH, Inc. v. Mesa Unified School District No. 4 673 P.2d 934 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
ASH, Inc. v. Mesa Unified School District No. 4 673 P.2d 934 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983