Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc., 673 P.2d 927.

368 citing documents.

City of Prescott v. Town of Chino Valley 790 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
The trial court nevertheless denied Chino Valley’s request for fees on the grounds that its counsel failed to present the proper specific basis of their claimed charges, then totalling over $74,000, with the specificity required by Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Jim Click Ford, Inc. v. City of Tucson 739 P.2d 1365 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Jim Click Ford, Inc. v. City of Tucson 739 P.2d 1365 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
(1986 Supp.), and Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Higgins v. Higgins 740 P.2d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Higgins v. Higgins 740 P.2d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
(1986 Supp.), and Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Holt v. Utica Mutual Insurance 759 P.2d 617 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Holt v. Utica Mutual Insurance 759 P.2d 617 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Accordingly, we grant Utica’s request for attorney’s fees in an amount to be determined following a submission of a statement of costs in compliance with Rule 21(c), Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure and this court’s opinion in Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Janssen 742 P.2d 1372 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Janssen 742 P.2d 1372 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
The Janssens may establish the amount of their award by complying with Rule 21(c), Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, and our decision in Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. Oliver 741 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. Oliver 741 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
the award by complying with Rule 21(c), Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, and our decision in Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Physical Therapy Associates, Inc. v. Pinal County 743 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Physical Therapy Associates, Inc. v. Pinal County 743 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
All Points Towing, Inc. v. City of Glendale 735 P.2d 145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
All Points Towing, Inc. v. City of Glendale 735 P.2d 145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
(1986 Supp.), and Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Carley v. Arizona Board of Regents 737 P.2d 1099 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Carley v. Arizona Board of Regents 737 P.2d 1099 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
In the exercise of our discretion, we award attorneys’ fees to the Arizona Board of Regents and President Hughes in an amount to be determined following submission of a statement of costs in accordance with Rule 21(c) and this court’s
Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Pochiro 736 P.2d 1180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Pochiro 736 P.2d 1180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
(1986 Supp.), and Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Pioneer Roofing Co. v. Mardian Construction Co. 733 P.2d 652 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Pioneer Roofing Co. v. Mardian Construction Co. 733 P.2d 652 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
*468 Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Daggett v. Jackie Fine Arts, Inc. 733 P.2d 1142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Daggett v. Jackie Fine Arts, Inc. 733 P.2d 1142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
(1985 Supp.), and Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Realty Associates v. Valley National Bank 738 P.2d 1121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Realty Associates v. Valley National Bank 738 P.2d 1121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
We award Associates its attorney’s fees on appeal in an amount to be determined after a statement of costs is filed in compliance with Rule 21(c), Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure and this court’s decision in Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Trus Joist Corp. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 735 P.2d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Trus Joist Corp. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 735 P.2d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Britt v. Red Mesa Unified School District No. 27 748 P.2d 1195 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Britt v. Red Mesa Unified School District No. 27 748 P.2d 1195 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Britt and Parido may establish the amount of their award by complying with Rule 21(c) and our decision in Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
USLife Title Co. of Arizona v. Gutkin 732 P.2d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
USLife Title Co. of Arizona v. Gutkin 732 P.2d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
See Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Mark Lighting Fixture Co. v. General Electric Supply Co. 745 P.2d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Mark Lighting Fixture Co. v. General Electric Supply Co. 745 P.2d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
The appellee may establish the amount of its award by complying with Rule 21(c), Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, and our decision in Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Continental Townhouses East Unit One Ass'n v. Brockbank 733 P.2d 1120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Alano Club 12, Inc. v. Hibbs 724 P.2d 47 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Continental Townhouses East Unit One Ass'n v. Brockbank 733 P.2d 1120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Clearly, since the legal assistant must perform legal work and be supervised by an attorney, the fee application must contain enough details to demonstrate to the court that these requirements have been met, thereby comporting with the spirit of Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Alano Club 12, Inc. v. Hibbs 724 P.2d 47 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Appellees’ only response to this issue is that they are entitled to all of the fees requested pursuant to Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc., , in which this court recognized the difficulty in distinguishing time spent on various legal theories underlying a claim for relief and held that “where a party has accomplished the results sought in the litigation, fees should be awarded for time spent even on unsuccesful legal theories.” 138
State ex rel. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Arizona Sand & Rock Co. 745 P.2d 108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State ex rel. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Arizona Sand & Rock Co. 745 P.2d 108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
AS & R may establish the amount of its award by complying with Rule 21(c), Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, and our decision in Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Amex Distributing Co., Inc. v. Mascari 724 P.2d 596 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Amex Distributing Co., Inc. v. Mascari 724 P.2d 596 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
The amount of attorney’s fees will be determined pursuant to ARCAP Rule 21(c) and Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners AD 747 P.2d 1214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners AD 747 P.2d 1214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
(1985 Supp.), and Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Campbell v. Warren 726 P.2d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Campbell v. Warren 726 P.2d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
(1985 Supp.), and Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Ina Insurance Co. of North America v. Valley Forge Insurance 722 P.2d 975 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Ina Insurance Co. of North America v. Valley Forge Insurance 722 P.2d 975 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
See Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Quiroga v. Allstate Insurance 726 P.2d 224 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Quiroga v. Allstate Insurance 726 P.2d 224 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
(1985 Supp.), and Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Fore v. Bles 721 P.2d 151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by