Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc., 673 P.2d 927.

368 citing documents.

Fore v. Bles 721 P.2d 151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Fore is directed to comply with Rule 21(c), Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, in the manner set forth in Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
In Re Marriage of Benge 726 P.2d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
In Re Marriage of Benge 726 P.2d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc., , 186 n. 5, , 930 n. 5 (App.1983) The fact that the trial court used the wrong descriptive term does not affect the award.
Short v. Riley 724 P.2d 1252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Short v. Riley 724 P.2d 1252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
(1985 Supp.), and Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Acolla v. Peralta 721 P.2d 1162 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Acolla v. Peralta 721 P.2d 1162 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Squaw Peak Community Covenant Church v. Anozira Development, Inc. 719 P.2d 295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Squaw Peak Community Covenant Church v. Anozira Development, Inc. 719 P.2d 295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
In the exercise of our discretion, and based upon our determinations above, having successfully prosecuted their claim, the appellant Church may recover its attorney’s fees on appeal by complying with Rule 21, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, and our decision in Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, *415 Inc.
Sullivan v. Metro Productions, Inc. 724 P.2d 1242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Sullivan v. Metro Productions, Inc. 724 P.2d 1242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
(1985 Supp.), and Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
United Bank v. Sun Valley Door & Supply, Inc. 716 P.2d 433 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Ball v. City of Chandler Improvement District No. 48 724 P.2d 1228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
United Bank v. Sun Valley Door & Supply, Inc. 716 P.2d 433 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Having successfully prosecuted this claim, appellee may recover its attorney’s fees on appeal by complying with Rule 21, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellant Procedure, and our decision in Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Ball v. City of Chandler Improvement District No. 48 724 P.2d 1228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Based upon our determinations above, having successfully prosecuted their claim, appellees Germain H. Ball, et al., may recover their attorney’s fees on appeal by complying with Rule 21, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, and our decision in Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Christmas v. Turkin 716 P.2d 59 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Christmas v. Turkin 716 P.2d 59 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
The appellees will be awarded attorney fees on appeal as requested upon filing a statement of costs pursuant to Rule 21(c), Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S., and Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Turnkey Corp. v. Rappeport 720 P.2d 115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Turnkey Corp. v. Rappeport 720 P.2d 115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
(1985 Supp.), and Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
U.S. Life Title Co. v. Bliss 722 P.2d 356 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
U.S. Life Title Co. v. Bliss 722 P.2d 356 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
(1985 Supp.), and Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Gaertner v. Sommer 714 P.2d 1316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Gaertner v. Sommer 714 P.2d 1316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Appellee will be awarded attorney’s fees on appeal as requested upon filing a statement of costs pursuant to Rule 21(c), Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S., and Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Linthicum v. Nationwide Life Insurance 723 P.2d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Linthicum v. Nationwide Life Insurance 723 P.2d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
A statement of the amount claimed shall be filed with supporting affidavits in compliance with Rule 21(c), Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, and this court’s decision in Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Dooley's of Tucson, Inc. 716 P.2d 1042 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Dooley's of Tucson, Inc. 716 P.2d 1042 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
(1984 Supp.), and Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital 710 P.2d 1025 Ariz. 1985
City of Phoenix v. Marathon Steel Co. 722 P.2d 341 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
City of Phoenix v. Marathon Steel Co. 722 P.2d 341 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Marathon is directed to file a statement of costs in compliance with Rule 21(c), Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, and Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Boltz & Odegaard v. Hohn 714 P.2d 854 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Boltz & Odegaard v. Hohn 714 P.2d 854 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Hohn argues that the attorney’s
Fisher v. Mission Viejo Co. 714 P.2d 850 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Fisher v. Mission Viejo Co. 714 P.2d 850 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Cross-appellees may recover their attorney’s fees on appeal by complying with Rule 21, ARCAP, and our decision in Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
National Indemnity Co. v. St. Paul Insurance Companies 724 P.2d 578 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
National Indemnity Co. v. St. Paul Insurance Companies 724 P.2d 578 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Appellants are directed to submit an affidavit in accordance with Rule 21(c), Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, and Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Jerman v. O'LEARY 701 P.2d 1205 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Jerman v. O'LEARY 701 P.2d 1205 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
As is pointed out in Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc., , the lode star method is unnecessary where the parties have agreed that payment for legal services is to be made based upon the attorney’s billing rate charged for time actually expended.
Winter v. Coor 695 P.2d 1094 Ariz. 1985
Winter v. Coor 695 P.2d 1094 Ariz. 1985
On appeal, the Town of Goodyear protested certain portions of Winter’s attorneys’ fees, alleging that time expended in legal efforts which proved unsuccessful should not be rewarded, Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
McKinley v. Town of Fredonia 695 P.2d 284 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
McKinley v. Town of Fredonia 695 P.2d 284 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Upon the submission of a , we will set and award fees for appellate work.
G & S INVESTMENTS v. Belman 700 P.2d 1358 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
G & S INVESTMENTS v. Belman 700 P.2d 1358 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Appellees’ motion for attorney’s fees on appeal is granted and their attorney is directed to file an affidavit of fees and costs pursuant to Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc., , for defense of the appeal.
Phillips v. Superior Court 692 P.2d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Phillips v. Superior Court 692 P.2d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Petitioners are directed to submit an affidavit in compliance with Rule 21(e), Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S., and Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc., , together with their statement of costs.
Horizon Corp. v. Westcor, Inc. 688 P.2d 1021 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Horizon Corp. v. Westcor, Inc. 688 P.2d 1021 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
The amount will be determined upon the submission of Westcor’s statement of costs pursuant to Rule 21(c), Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, and Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.
Esplendido Apartments v. Olsson 697 P.2d 1105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Esplendido Apartments v. Olsson 697 P.2d 1105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Seller shall file a statement of amount claimed for such fees with supporting affidavits in compliance with Rule 21(c); Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, and this court’s decision in Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by