Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A., 653 P.2d 45.

49 citing documents.

Club West v. Shea homes/the Edge Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Club West v. Shea homes/the Edge Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶42 We should also mention Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A.
Dooley Corvallas Development Corp. v. O'Brien 244 P.3d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Dooley Corvallas Development Corp. v. O'Brien 244 P.3d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
See Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A., , Lake Havasu Cmty.
Zeagler v. Buckley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Zeagler v. Buckley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
She cites Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A., P.2d 45 (App. 1982), P.2d 1218 (1987), for the proposition that a trial court may not make an award of fees once a notice of appeal has been filed.
Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass'n 167 P.3d 1277 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass'n 167 P.3d 1277 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Co., , (fact that defendants proved the nonexistence of a contractual relationship does not preclude an award of attorney’s fees under section 12-341.01 if plaintiffs claim arose out of contract) (citing Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A., , ); Shirley v. Hartford Accident & Indem.
Allstate Insurance v. Universal Underwriters, Inc. 17 P.3d 106 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Allstate Insurance v. Universal Underwriters, Inc. 17 P.3d 106 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
See Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A., , (when appeal to higher court has been perfected, trial court loses all jurisdiction except that in furtherance of appeal; thus, trial court may not award attorney’s fees pursuant to § 12-341.01(A) when notice of appeal has been filed from judgment on underlying contract claim on which award ba
Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc. 6 P.3d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Desert Golf Cars v. Yamaha Motor Co. 7 P.3d 112 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Desert Golf Cars v. Yamaha Motor Co. 7 P.3d 112 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
See, e.g., Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A., , (court of appeals reaching issues not necessary to holding to assist trial court on remand), disapproved on other grounds, Barmat v. John & Jane Doe Partners A-D
Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc. 6 P.3d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Barmat expressly rejected the contrary analysis of Tre-bilcox v. Brown & Bain
Matter of Estate of Killen 937 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
McCannon v. McCannon 937 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
McCannon v. McCannon 937 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
In finding that it did not have jurisdiction to award Marion attorneys’ fees from the estate, the probate court relied on Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A., , disapproved in other part
Matter of Estate of Killen 937 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
In finding that it did not have jurisdiction to award Marion attorneys' fees from the estate, the probate court relied on Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A., , disapproved in other part
Curtis v. Morris 909 P.2d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Curtis v. Morris 909 P.2d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A., , overruled on other grounds, Barmat v. John & Jane Doe Partners A-D
Midland Risk Management Co. v. Watford 876 P.2d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Midland Risk Management Co. v. Watford 876 P.2d 1203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
See Trebilocox v. Brown & Bain, P.A., , (trial court may not award attorneys’ fees after the filing of a notice of appeal), overruled on other grounds
Mullins v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 851 P.2d 839 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Mullins v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 851 P.2d 839 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A., , citing Shirley v. Hartford Accident & Indem.
Lightning "A" Ranch Venture v. Tankersley 779 P.2d 812 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Lightning "A" Ranch Venture v. Tankersley 779 P.2d 812 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A., , disapproved on other grounds, Barmat v. John & Jane Doe Partners A-D
Lightning "A" Ranch Venture v. Tankersley 775 P.2d 1102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Lightning "A" Ranch Venture v. Tankersley 775 P.2d 1102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A., , disapproved on other grounds, Barmat v. John & Jane Doe Partners A-D
MacIborski v. Chase Service Corp. 779 P.2d 1296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
MacIborski v. Chase Service Corp. 779 P.2d 1296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
In response to the motion to dismiss, Chase cited to Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A., , which provides that a request for attorney’s fees is not a separate claim, that the absence of a disposition of a request for attorney’s fees does not preclude an otherwise final judgment from becoming final and appealable, and that the trial court loses jurisdiction to award attorney’s fees
Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners AD 747 P.2d 1218 Ariz. 1987
Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners AD 747 P.2d 1218 Ariz. 1987
ttorney’s fees for breach of bailment contract implied in fact); , (declining to apply contract statute of limitations in malpractice action against accountant); Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., , (disallowing attorney’s fees in malpractice action against accountant); Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A., , (reaching opposite result in breach of fiduciary duty action against attorney).
Haldiman v. Gosnell Development Corp. 748 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Ford v. Revlon, Inc. 734 P.2d 580 Ariz. 1987
Ford v. Revlon, Inc. 734 P.2d 580 Ariz. 1987
Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain
Western Technologies, Inc. v. Sverdrup & Parcel, Inc. 739 P.2d 1318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Western Technologies, Inc. v. Sverdrup & Parcel, Inc. 739 P.2d 1318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A., , and Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co.
Cauble v. Osselaer 722 P.2d 983 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Distinguished Cauble v. Osselaer 722 P.2d 983 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Osselaer argues that ASH, Inc. is distinguishable on its facts and that our earlier decision in Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A., , states the applicable test.
Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., Ltd. 725 P.2d 736 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., Ltd. 725 P.2d 736 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
District No. 4, , and Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A.
Buckmaster v. Dent 707 P.2d 319 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Buckmaster v. Dent 707 P.2d 319 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
In Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A., , the defendants proved an attorney-client relationship did not exist in a suit for breach of fiduciary duty.
Lake Havasu Community Hospital, Inc. v. Arizona Title Insurance 687 P.2d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
LAKE HAVASU COM. HOSP. v. Ariz. Title Ins. 687 P.2d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
LAKE HAVASU COM. HOSP. v. Ariz. Title Ins. 687 P.2d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
See also, Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A.
Lake Havasu Community Hospital, Inc. v. Arizona Title Insurance 687 P.2d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
See also, Tre-bilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A.
ASH, Inc. v. Mesa Unified School District No. 4 673 P.2d 934 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
ASH, Inc. v. Mesa Unified School District No. 4 673 P.2d 934 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
490 , 74 L.Ed.2d 632 (1982) (action alleging tort of bad faith which court found intertwined with breach of duty implied in insurance contract); , (action to enforce restrictive covenant which was essentially an action to enforce mutual contractual obligations); Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A., , (action alleging breach of fiduciary duty which was based on attorney-client contract).