Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue, 709 P.2d 573.

46 citing documents.

Huber v. Arizona Naturopathic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Huber v. Arizona Naturopathic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Copper Co. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue, (emphasis added).
Mesquite v. Ador Ariz. 2024
Mesquite v. Ador Ariz. 2024
Copper Co. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue, superseded by statute on other grounds, 1990 Ariz. Sess.
Mesquite v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Mesquite v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Copper Co. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue
Fitzhugh v. Princeton Ins. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Fitzhugh v. Princeton Ins. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Copper Co. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue
In Re Indenture of Trust Dated January 13, 1964 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Weinstein v. Weinstein 326 P.3d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
In Re Indenture of Trust Dated January 13, 1964 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Copper Co. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue, (state’s assertions that amount requested far exceeded its own fees without references to specified billing items insufficient), disapproved of on other grounds by Cyprus Bagdad Copper Corp. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue
Weinstein v. Weinstein 326 P.3d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Copper Co. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue, , (state’s assertions that amount requested far exceeded its own fees without references to specified billing items insufficient), disapproved of on other grounds by Cyprus Bag-dad Copper Corp. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue
Delmastro & Eells v. Taco Bell Corp. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Delmastro & Eells v. Taco Bell Corp. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Copper Co. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue, (declining to address alleged errors when appellant failed to set forth challenged jury instructions in brief or appendix as required by appell
Eurofresh, Inc. v. Graham County 187 P.3d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Eurofresh, Inc. v. Graham County 187 P.3d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Copper Co. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue, , superseded by statute on other grounds, A.R.S.
Cyprus Bagdad Copper Corp. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 992 P.2d 5 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Cyprus Bagdad Copper Corp. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 992 P.2d 5 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State Ex Rel. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Capitol Castings, Inc. 970 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State Ex Rel. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Capitol Castings, Inc. 970 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Copper Co. v. Arizona Dep’t of Revenue, , ).
Crystal Point Joint Venture v. Arizona Department of Revenue 932 P.2d 1367 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Crystal Point Joint Venture v. Arizona Department of Revenue 932 P.2d 1367 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Copper Co. v. Arizona Dep’t of Revenue, , (emphasis added)
Renalwest L.C. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 943 P.2d 769 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Renalwest L.C. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 943 P.2d 769 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Copper Co. v. Arizona Dep’t of Revenue, , (citing A.R.S.
Cyprus Bagdad Copper Corp. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 935 P.2d 923 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Cyprus Bagdad Copper Corp. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 935 P.2d 923 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
-32 , -89 (App.1985), and Stewart Title & , both property tax cases which had held that the pre-amendment predecessors of A.R.S.
City of Phoenix v. Paper Distributors of Arizona, Inc. 925 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
City of Phoenix v. Paper Distributors of Arizona, Inc. 925 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
See Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. Arizona Dep’t of Revenue, , (“The provisions of subsections (A)(2) and (A)(3) of the statute are unambiguous and directly applicable to property tax valuation issues”); Stewart Title &amp
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Tocco 845 P.2d 513 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Tocco 845 P.2d 513 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Arizona Tax Research Ass'n v. Department of Revenue 787 P.2d 1051 Ariz. 1989
Arizona Tax Research Ass'n v. Department of Revenue 787 P.2d 1051 Ariz. 1989
Maricopa County v. Arizona Tax Court 781 P.2d 41 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Maricopa County v. Arizona Tax Court 781 P.2d 41 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Bella Vista Ranches, Inc. v. Cochise County 767 P.2d 49 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Bella Vista Ranches, Inc. v. Cochise County 767 P.2d 49 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Central Citrus Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 760 P.2d 562 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Central Citrus Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 760 P.2d 562 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Central Citrus maintains that it was entitled to a trial de novo in the superior court
Stewart Title & Trust of Tucson v. Pima County 751 P.2d 552 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Stewart Title & Trust of Tucson v. Pima County 751 P.2d 552 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Recreation Centers of Sun City, Inc. v. Maricopa County 782 P.2d 1170 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Recreation Centers of Sun City, Inc. v. Maricopa County 782 P.2d 1170 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Alano Club 12, Inc. v. Hibbs 724 P.2d 47 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Alano Club 12, Inc. v. Hibbs 724 P.2d 47 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Arizona Department of Revenue v. Navopache Electric Co-Op, Inc. 727 P.2d 813 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Arizona Department of Revenue v. Navopache Electric Co-Op, Inc. 727 P.2d 813 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986