Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite ASH, Inc. v. Mesa Unified School District No. 4, 673 P.2d 934.

76 citing documents.

Rozenman v. Blanco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
No. 4, -92 (App. 1983) (finding moot a request to declare a fully performed contract void).
Sw Fabrication v. Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
No. 4, Western Sun Contractors Co. v. Super.
Shaffer v. Procaccianti Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Power v. Gilbert Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Power v. Gilbert Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
No. 4, -92, -36 (App. 1983) (holding that plaintiff’s appeal was moot where challenged contract had been fully performed and plaintiff, in failing to seek any of the available procedural remedies to stay performance of the contract pending litigation, had not effectively preserved the issue on appeal); a
Abbott v. Banner Health Network 341 P.3d 478 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Abbott v. Banner Health Network 341 P.3d 478 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
No. A, , (holding that petition to cancel an award of a contract to one party and award it to another arose out of contract for purposes of A.R.S.
Mohr v. Murphy Elementary Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Mohr v. Murphy Elementary Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
No. 4, (fully executed contract that was sought to be enjoined renders challenge to denial of injunctive relief moot based on changed circumstances); but see Pointe Resorts, - 41, -45 (1988) (based on “policy considerations,” summari
Assyia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 273 P.3d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Assyia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 273 P.3d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
No. 4, , (“[A]s used in A.R.S.
Keystone Floor & More, LLC v. Arizona Registrar of Contractors 219 P.3d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Keystone Floor & More, LLC v. Arizona Registrar of Contractors 219 P.3d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
No. 4, -93 , -37 (App.1983).
MacKey, Schuessler, Bayly v. Mayor and Council of the City of Tucson 96 P.3d 231 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
MacKey, Schuessler, Bayly v. Mayor and Council of the City of Tucson 96 P.3d 231 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
2 ¶3 Preliminarily, relying on ASH, Inc. v. Mesa Unified School District No. 4, P.2d 934 (App. 1983), the City argues that this appeal is moot because the Mackeys did not post a supersedeas bond, the transaction has been completed,1 and the third party to whom the property was transferred is not a party to this action.
Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc. 6 P.3d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc. 6 P.3d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Schwab Sales, Inc. v. GN Const. Co., Inc. 992 P.2d 1128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Schwab Sales, Inc. v. GN Const. Co., Inc. 992 P.2d 1128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Tire Shredders, Inc. v. Pima County 965 P.2d 86 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Tire Shredders, Inc. v. Pima County 965 P.2d 86 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Clark Equipment Co. v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 943 P.2d 793 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Clark Equip. v. PROP. & CAS. INS. GUAR. 943 P.2d 793 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Clark Equipment Co. v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 943 P.2d 793 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Clark Equip. v. PROP. & CAS. INS. GUAR. 943 P.2d 793 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Pelletier v. Johnson 937 P.2d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Pelletier v. Johnson 937 P.2d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Dist., -93 , -37 (App.1983).
Kennedy v. Linda Brock Automotive Plaza, Inc. 856 P.2d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Kennedy v. Linda Brock Automotive Plaza, Inc. 856 P.2d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Sullivan v. State Land Department 838 P.2d 1360 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Sullivan v. State Land Department 838 P.2d 1360 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
*601 THE COURT FINDS that this is an action arising out of contract and is similar to the facts in Ash
McAlister v. Citibank 829 P.2d 1253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
McAlister v. Citibank 829 P.2d 1253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
O'KEEFE v. Grenke 825 P.2d 985 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
O'KEEFE v. Grenke 825 P.2d 985 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
S.K. Drywall, Inc. v. Developers Financial Group, Inc. 799 P.2d 1362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
S.K. Drywall, Inc. v. Developers Financial Group, Inc. 799 P.2d 1362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Relying on McKesson Chemical Co. v. Van Waters & Rogers, , and ASH, Inc. v. Mesa Unified School District No. 4, , Sunland argues that attorney’s fees are awardable under A.R.S.
Fund Manager v. Corbin 778 P.2d 1244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Fund Manager v. Corbin 778 P.2d 1244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Western Sun Contractors Co. v. Superior Court 766 P.2d 96 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Western Sun Contractors Co. v. Superior Court 766 P.2d 96 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
No. 4, , (holding that attempt to void public contract that was fully performed and award contract to another bidder was moot and writ of mandamus request was futile).
Pointe Resorts, Inc. v. Culbertson 761 P.2d 1041 Ariz. 1988
Pointe Resorts, Inc. v. Culbertson 761 P.2d 1041 Ariz. 1988
No. 4, , vacated in part on other grounds sub nom.
Haldiman v. Gosnell Development Corp. 748 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. Clark 759 P.2d 602 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. Clark 759 P.2d 602 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
490 , 74 L.Ed.2d 632 (1982); Ash, Inc. v. *461 Mesa Unified School District No. 4
Trus Joist Corp. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 735 P.2d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Trus Joist Corp. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 735 P.2d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Con-tempo-Tempe Mobile Home Owner’s Ass’ , Ash
Britt v. Red Mesa Unified School District No. 27 748 P.2d 1195 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Britt v. Red Mesa Unified School District No. 27 748 P.2d 1195 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986