Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite ASH, Inc. v. Mesa Unified School District No. 4, 673 P.2d 934.
- Marcus v. Fox 723 P.2d 682 Ariz. 1986
- Marcus v. Fox 723 P.2d 682 Ariz. 1986
- Cauble v. Osselaer 722 P.2d 983 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
-
Cauble v. Osselaer
722 P.2d 983
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Ash, Inc. v. Mesa Unified School District No. 4, -193
- Matter of King 722 P.2d 374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
-
Matter of King
722 P.2d 374
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
ASH, Inc. v. Mesa Unified School District No. 4, , , (App.1983).
- Sanchez-O'Brien Minerals Corp. v. State 717 P.2d 937 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
-
Sanchez-O'Brien Minerals Corp. v. State
717 P.2d 937
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
While the motion is silent as against whom it desires to collect attor *264 ney’s fees, we assume it is against Sanchez-O’Brien as it relies upon ASH
- Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., Ltd. 725 P.2d 736 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
-
Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., Ltd.
725 P.2d 736
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
District No. 4, , and Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A.
- United Bank v. Sun Valley Door & Supply, Inc. 716 P.2d 433 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- Ball v. City of Chandler Improvement District No. 48 724 P.2d 1228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
-
United Bank v. Sun Valley Door & Supply, Inc.
716 P.2d 433
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Furthermore “ ‘arising out of contract’ describefs] an action in which a contract was a factor causing the dispute.” ASH, Inc. v. Mesa Unified School District No. 4
- Ball v. City of Chandler Improvement District No. 48 724 P.2d 1228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- Marcus v. Fox 723 P.2d 691 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- Marcus v. Fox 723 P.2d 691 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- Campbell v. Westdahl 715 P.2d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- Campbell v. Westdahl 715 P.2d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- National Indemnity Co. v. St. Paul Insurance Companies 724 P.2d 578 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
-
National Indemnity Co. v. St. Paul Insurance Companies
724 P.2d 578
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Arizona Revised Statutes § 12-341.01(A) provides for recovery of attorney’s fees in an action “arising out of a contract, express or implied.” In Ash, , we interpreted this provision, stating, “Thus, as used in A.R.S.
- Carpenter v. Carpenter 722 P.2d 298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
-
Carpenter v. Carpenter
722 P.2d 298
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
the court stated: [A]s used in A.R.S.
- Mother Tucker's Food Experience & Insurance v. Industrial Commission 690 P.2d 797 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- Mother Tucker's Food Experience & Insurance v. Industrial Commission 690 P.2d 797 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- Wistuber v. Paradise Valley Unified School District 687 P.2d 354 Ariz. 1984
-
Wistuber v. Paradise Valley Unified School District
687 P.2d 354
Ariz. 1984
5 Ash, Inc. v. Mesa Unified School District No. 4