Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite USLife Title Co. of Arizona v. Gutkin, 732 P.2d 579.

30 citing documents.

Amar Law v. Goodman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Amar Law v. Goodman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Mayfield v. Mayfield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Mayfield v. Mayfield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Duran v. Terrones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Duran v. Terrones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Erlick v. Davis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Erlick v. Davis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
ERLICK v. DAVIS Decision of the Court ¶18 Davis argues the court erred in finding that Michele’s disclaimer/quitclaim deed was unenforceable given the allegation that she signed the deed “under duress and without consideration.” See, e.g., Inter- Tel, Inc. v. Bank of Am., Ariz., ¶ 36 (App. 1999)
In Re the Marriage of Rojas 530 P.3d 1167 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
In Re the Marriage of Rojas 530 P.3d 1167 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
(consideration for contracts defined as “any benefit to the promisor or detriment to the promisee”).
Boyle v. Malta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Boyle v. Malta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Coburn v. Rhodig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Coburn v. Rhodig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Williams v. Stapley-Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Williams v. Stapley-Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 175 cmt.
Estrada v. Figari Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Estrada v. Figari Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Best Choice Fund, LLC v. Low & Childers, P.C. 269 P.3d 678 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Best Choice Fund, LLC v. Low & Childers, P.C. 269 P.3d 678 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Waterfall, Economidis, Caldwell, Hanshaw & Villamana, P.C. v. Pima County 88 P.3d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Waterfall, Economidis, Caldwell, Hanshaw & Villamana, P.C. v. Pima County 88 P.3d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
The Arizona Supreme Court has stated that “where there is a specific contract which governs the relationship of the parties, the doctrine of unjust enrichment has no application.” Brooks v. Valley Nat’l Bank, , see also USLife Title *465 , Johnson v. Am.
Demasse v. ITT Corp. 984 P.2d 1138 Ariz. 1999
Demasse v. ITT Corp. 984 P.2d 1138 Ariz. 1999
Demasse v. ITT Corp. 984 P.2d 1138 Ariz. 1999
*507 , Restatement § 71.
Demasse v. ITT Corp. 984 P.2d 1138 Ariz. 1999
*1145 , RESTATEMENT § 71.
Inter-Tel, Inc. v. Bank of America 985 P.2d 596 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Inter-Tel, Inc. v. Bank of America 985 P.2d 596 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
-57 , -87 (App.1986); Frank Culver Elec., Inc., 136 Ariz. at 78 , 664 P.2d at 228 .
Hill v. Chubb Life American Insurance 894 P.2d 701 Ariz. 1995
Hill v. Chubb Life American Insurance 894 P.2d 701 Ariz. 1995
Rather, “any benefit to the promisor or detriment to the promisee is sufficient.”