Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Gilbert v. Board of Medical Examiners, 745 P.2d 617.

113 citing documents.

Derek D. Fraser v. State of Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Derek D. Fraser v. State of Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
In dismissing this claim
Flanigan v. Aroc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Flanigan v. Aroc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Stock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Stock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Soughar v. Montoya Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Soughar v. Montoya Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Exam’rs, ¶ 25 n.7 (App. 1999).
Gitman v. Simpson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Gitman v. Simpson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Abc v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Abc v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Exam’rs, ¶ 25 n.7 (App. 1999)).
Legacy v. Citizens Clean Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Legacy v. Citizens Clean Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Exam’rs, ¶ 25 n.7 (App. 1999).
Kresock v. Depaoli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Kresock v. Depaoli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Shield v. Lionheart Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Shield v. Lionheart Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Exam’rs, (in ruling on motions for summary judgment, trial court is not required to search the record for facts or arguments that support the 5 SHIELD v. LIONHEART, et al. Decision of the Court opposing party; trial co
McDivitt v. Geico Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
McDivitt v. Geico Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Exam’rs, n.7, ¶ 25 (App. 1999); (Courts are not “required to perform counsel’s work by searching the record to attempt to discover facts which
Legacy v. Citizens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Legacy v. Citizens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶13 as support for its position that the superior court’s appellate jurisdiction extends to untimely appeals challenging an administrative agency’s jurisdiction.
Falcone Brothers & Associates, Inc. v. City of Tucson 381 P.3d 276 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Falcone Brothers & Associates, Inc. v. City of Tucson 381 P.3d 276 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Schaub v. Nfra Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Schaub v. Nfra Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Exam’rs, (citation omitted), abrogated by statute on other grounds.
Quihuis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 334 P.3d 719 Ariz. 2014
Quihuis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 334 P.3d 719 Ariz. 2014
Exam’rs of Ariz., –75, –23 (App. 1987).
Hess v. Purcell 274 P.3d 520 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Hess v. Purcell 274 P.3d 520 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Baier v. Mayer Unified School District 232 P.3d 747 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Baier v. Mayer Unified School District 232 P.3d 747 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Exam’rs, -75 , -23 (App.1987) (superseded by statute on other grounds).
State v. Arizona Navigable Stream Adjudication Commission 229 P.3d 242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State v. Arizona Navigable Stream Adjudication Commission 229 P.3d 242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Exam’rs, , (citations omitted), , 508 n. 7, ¶ 25, , 1067 n. 7 (App.1999)).
Tilley v. Delci 204 P.3d 1082 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Tilley v. Delci 204 P.3d 1082 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Exam’rs, , ("In ruling upon motions for summary judgment, the trial court is required to consider only those portions of the record which are brought to its attention by the parties.”), , 508 n.
Pettit v. Pettit 189 P.3d 1102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Pettit v. Pettit 189 P.3d 1102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Exam’rs, , (citation omitted), , 508 n. 7, ¶ 25, , 1067 n. 7 (App.1999); see also Montana v. United States, 440 U.S. 147, 153 , 99 S.Ct.
Abdulkadir Hourani v. Benson Hospital Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Abdulkadir Hourani v. Benson Hospital Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Pierce v. Molet 87 P.3d 89 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Pierce v. Molet 87 P.3d 89 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Mullenaux v. Graham County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Mullenaux v. Graham County 82 P.3d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Mullenaux v. Graham County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Exam’rs, P.2d 617 (App. 1987) (statute’s use of “may” rather than “shall” does not render it permissive); Farmers Inv.
Mullenaux v. Graham County 82 P.3d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Exam’rs, , (statute’s use of “may” rather than “shall” does not render it permissive); Farmers Inv.
Better Homes Construction, Inc. v. Goldwater 53 P.3d 1139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Better Homes Construction, Inc. v. Goldwater 53 P.3d 1139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Exam’rs, , , *299 622 (App.1987), , 508 n. 7, ¶ 25, , 1067 n. 7 (App.1999).
Rowland v. Great States Insurance 20 P.3d 1158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Rowland v. Great States Insurance 20 P.3d 1158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by