Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Gilbert v. Board of Medical Examiners, 745 P.2d 617.

113 citing documents.

Southwestern Paint & Varnish Co. v. Arizona Department of Environmental Quality 976 P.2d 872 Ariz. 1999
Goodman v. Samaritan Health System 990 P.2d 1061 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Goodman v. Samaritan Health System 990 P.2d 1061 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Fisher Ex Rel. Fisher v. National General Insurance 965 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Fisher Ex Rel. Fisher v. National General Insurance 965 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Cunningham v. Goettl Air Conditioning, Inc. 980 P.2d 495 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Cunningham v. Goettl Air Conditioning, Inc. 980 P.2d 495 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
of Medical Examiners, , see also Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Phoenix Sand & Rock
Hall v. Lalli 952 P.2d 748 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Hall v. Lalli 952 P.2d 748 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
ABC Supply, Inc. v. Edwards 952 P.2d 286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
ABC Supply, Inc. v. Edwards 952 P.2d 286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
(citing Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, 780 F.2d 823, 828 (9th Cir.1986)).
Murphy v. Board of Medical Examiners 949 P.2d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Murphy v. Board of Medical Examiners 949 P.2d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Department of Corrections 934 P.2d 801 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Department of Corrections 934 P.2d 801 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Heuisler, 168 Ariz. at 284 , 812 P.2d at 1102 ( 184 , 632 (App.1987)).
Collins v. Miller & Miller, Ltd. 943 P.2d 747 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Collins v. Miller & Miller, Ltd. 943 P.2d 747 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Hamilton v. State 925 P.2d 731 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Hamilton v. State 925 P.2d 731 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
v. Dann, -33 , -72 (App.1982)) (“The use of the word ‘may’ indicates an option only in the sense that a party may decide not to pursue any further review.”); , Farmers Inv.
State Ex Rel. Department of Economic Security v. Powers 908 P.2d 49 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State Ex Rel. Department of Economic Security v. Powers 908 P.2d 49 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Rosen v. BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS OF STATE 912 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Rosen v. BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS OF STATE 912 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Id.; , (similarly interpreting the use of the word “may” in a statute authorizing the appeal of Board decisions to the superior court).
IRBY Construction Co v. Arizona Department of Revenue 907 P.2d 74 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
IRBY Construction Co v. Arizona Department of Revenue 907 P.2d 74 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Hawkins v. State, Dept. of Economic SEC. 900 P.2d 1236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Hawkins v. State, Dept. of Economic SEC. 900 P.2d 1236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Guertin v. Pinal County 875 P.2d 843 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Guertin v. Pinal County 875 P.2d 843 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
S & R PROPERTIES v. Maricopa County 875 P.2d 150 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
S & R PROPERTIES v. Maricopa County 875 P.2d 150 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Standage v. Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. 866 P.2d 889 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Standage v. Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. 866 P.2d 889 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center v. Hansgen 848 P.2d 313 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Matter of Estate of Craig 848 P.2d 313 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Matter of Estate of Craig 848 P.2d 313 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center v. Hansgen 848 P.2d 313 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Heuisler v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 812 P.2d 1096 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Heuisler v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 812 P.2d 1096 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Co., , or whether a sanction imposed under Rule 11 was appropriate
Wieman v. Roysden 802 P.2d 432 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Wieman v. Roysden 802 P.2d 432 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
We agree with this analysis, , (issue on appeal was whether Rule 11 sanctions against attorney were properly imposed; no discussion whether court had jurisdiction over appeal by nonparty attorney).
United Bank of Arizona v. Allyn 805 P.2d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
United Bank of Arizona v. Allyn 805 P.2d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Sabel, 138 Ariz. at 256 , 674 P.2d at 319 .
Wells Fargo Credit Corp. v. Smith 803 P.2d 900 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Wells Fargo Credit Corp. v. Smith 803 P.2d 900 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Chavarria v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 798 P.2d 1343 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Chavarria v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 798 P.2d 1343 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Wyatt v. Wehmueller 785 P.2d 581 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Wyatt v. Wehmueller 785 P.2d 581 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Aldabbagh v. Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses & Control 783 P.2d 1207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by