Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Goglia v. Bodnar, 749 P.2d 921.

50 citing documents.

HULL v. WILLIAMS Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
HULL v. WILLIAMS Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
(“When an error applies to only one party .
Anderson v. Winston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Anderson v. Winston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Vargas v. Vargas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Vargas v. Vargas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Rather, the test of what is excusable is whether the neglect or inadvertence is such as might be the act of a reasonable person under similar circumstances.”
Budziszewski v. budziszewski/campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Budziszewski v. budziszewski/campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
National Tax v. Sweeney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
National Tax v. Sweeney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
4 In reviewing a denial of a motion to set aside, “[w]e view the facts in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s ruling.” ¶ 2 (App. 2010) ( ¶ 2 (App. 2010), ).
Clarritt v. Scott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Clarritt v. Scott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
First Financial v. Claassen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
First Financial v. Claassen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
First United v. La Jolla Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
First United v. La Jolla Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Aa American v. Lewandowski Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Aa American v. Lewandowski Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“A clear showing of intent to waive is required for waiver of rights.” ¶ 17, ( ).
Scott v. Neal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Scott v. Neal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Rigoli v. 44 Monroe Marketing, LLC 336 P.3d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Rigoli v. 44 Monroe Marketing, LLC 336 P.3d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Edwards v. Magnus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Edwards v. Magnus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(noting that pure carelessness does not constitute a sufficient reason to set aside a default judgment).
In Re Marriage of Dougall 316 P.3d 591 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
In Re Marriage of Dougall 316 P.3d 591 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
(review restricted to questions raised in Rule 60(c), Ariz. R. Civ.
Miller v. Arizona Corp. Commission 251 P.3d 400 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Miller v. Arizona Corp. Commission 251 P.3d 400 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
“[Standing to raise an appeal is not equivalent to standing to raise a particular argument on appeal.”
Blair v. Burgener 245 P.3d 898 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Blair v. Burgener 245 P.3d 898 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Facts and Procedure ¶2 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s ruling on a motion to set aside a default judgment.”
Ezell v. Quon 233 P.3d 645 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Ezell v. Quon 233 P.3d 645 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Minjares v. State 219 P.3d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Minjares v. State 219 P.3d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
“A clear showing of intent to waive is required for waiver of rights.”
Haroutunian v. Valueoptions Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Haroutunian v. Valueoptions Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
can better assess the impact of what occurs before [it]”); (citing 28 Daou).
In Re Estate of Friedman 177 P.3d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
In Re Estate of Friedman 177 P.3d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
¶ 11 “Standing to raise an appeal is not equivalent to standing to raise a particular argument on appeal.” , see also Kerr, 197 Ariz. at 216, ¶ 11 , 3 P.3d at 1136 .
In re MH 2006-000749 152 P.3d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
In re MH 2006-000749 152 P.3d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
“Whether a right has been waived is a question of fact for the trial court.”
Kerr v. Killian 3 P.3d 1133 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Kerr v. Killian 3 P.3d 1133 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Nahom v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. 885 P.2d 1113 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Nahom v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. 885 P.2d 1113 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Meineke v. Twin City Fire Insurance 892 P.2d 1365 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Meineke v. Twin City Fire Insurance 892 P.2d 1365 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Centrust Mortgage Corp. v. PMI Mortgage Insurance 800 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Centrust Mortgage Corp. v. PMI Mortgage Insurance 800 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Mutual Insurance v. Bodnar 793 P.2d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Mutual Insurance v. Bodnar 793 P.2d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990