Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Vaughn, 176 P.3d 716.

42 citing documents.

State v. Turay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Turay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
“This court will uphold the superior court’s ‘finding that a probationer has violated probation unless the finding is arbitrary or unsupported by any theory of evidence.’” ¶ 14 (App. 2008) ( ¶ 3 (1999)).
State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
§ 13-901.01(G); ¶ 9 n.3 (App. 2008).
State v. Trotter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Trotter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. McSmith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. McSmith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
“This court will uphold the superior court’s ‘finding that a probationer has violated probation unless the finding is arbitrary or unsupported by any theory of evidence.’” ¶ 14 (App. 2008) ( ¶ 3 (1999)).
State v. Chavez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Chavez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Burney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Burney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Walker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Walker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
P. 27.8(e); ¶ 14 (App. 2008) (“This court will uphold the superior court’s ‘finding that a probationer has violated probation unless the finding is arbitrary or unsupported by any theory of evidence.’”) ( ¶ 3 (1999)).
State v. Josytewa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Josytewa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
n.2, ¶ 3 (App. 2008) ().
State v. Yak Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Yak Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Gorman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Gorman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(citation omitted); ¶ 18
State v. Oddo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Oddo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
n.2, ¶ 3, n.2 (App. 2008) ( ).
State v. Zotigh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Zotigh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Brain Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Brain Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
n.2, ¶ 3, n.2 (App. 2008).
State v. Shively 323 P.3d 1211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Shively 323 P.3d 1211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Spinelli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Spinelli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
n.2, ¶ 2, n.2 (App. 2008).
State v. Sarno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Sarno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 14, (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).
State v. Perkowski Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Perkowski Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Tatlow 290 P.3d 228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
State v. Tatlow 290 P.3d 228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
¶ 3 n. 2, , 717 n. 2 (App.2008).
State of Arizona v. Jerrold Dean Broman 265 P.3d 1101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State of Arizona v. Jerrold Dean Broman 265 P.3d 1101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
P. 27.8(b)(3); ¶¶ 14, 18, 720 (App. 2008).
State v. Hatch 239 P.3d 432 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State v. Hatch 239 P.3d 432 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
521 n. 5, ¶ 15, , 719 n. 5 (App.2008) (citing O’ ¶ 6 , ); , (recounting the history of Proposition 200).
State v. Fischer 199 P.3d 663 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
State v. Fischer 199 P.3d 663 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
"We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the superior court’s findings.” , 519 n. 2, ¶ 3, , 717 n. 2 (App.2008).