Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Organ, 234 P.3d 611.

35 citing documents.

State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Evidence discovered during an inventory search is not subject to the exclusionary rule “if two requirements are met: (1) law enforcement officials must have lawful possession or custody of the vehicle, and (2) the inventory search must have been conducted in good faith and not used as a subterfuge for a warrantless search.” ¶¶ 20–21 (App. 2010).
Rock Country v. 7b Building Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Rock Country v. 7b Building Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 26 (App. 2010) (holding the court implicitly found an officer’s testimony credible by ruling in the State’s favor).
State v. Aquino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Aquino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 10 (App. 2010) (citation omitted).
State v. McNeill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. McNeill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Lohse 431 P.3d 606 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Lohse 431 P.3d 606 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
¶ 8 (quoting State v. Organ , , ¶ 15, ) (alteration in Mendoza-Ruiz ).
State v. Whatley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Whatley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Black Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Black Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
or that [the] vehicle’s equipment is not in proper adjustment or repair”), and the community caretaker doctrine, -48, ¶ 19 (App. 2010) (concluding a welfare check of a vehicle parked on the shoulder with its emergency flashers activated that led to the discovery of illegal drugs “was an appropriate exercise of [the officer’s] community caretaking function and .
State v. Scott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Scott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“As a general rule, in order to be reasonable, a search or seizure must be made upon probable cause and pursuant to a legally issued warrant.” ¶ 11 (App. 2010).
State v. Leyva-Nafarrate Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Leyva-Nafarrate Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶12 “Inventory searches are a well-defined community caretaking exception to the probable cause and warrant requirements of the Fourth Amendment.”
State v. Kroetz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Kroetz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶14 “Inventory searches are a well-defined community caretaking exception to the probable cause and warrant requirements of the Fourth Amendment.” ¶ 20
State v. Walker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Walker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State of Arizona v. Johnathan Ian Burns 344 P.3d 303 Ariz. 2015
See Prince II, 226 Ariz. at 540 ¶ 98 n.7, 250 P.3d at 1169 n.7; State v. Hargrave, 225 Ariz. 43 STATE V. BURNS Opinion of the Court 1, 17 ¶ 72
State v. Wilson 333 P.3d 774 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Wilson 333 P.3d 774 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Citing the eommunity-earetaking function, Arizona courts have upheld: vehicle inventory searches, -22 , -43 (1973); -49 , ¶ ¶ 20-26, -17 (App. 2010); the retrieval of a visible firearm from the cab of a truck parked in a busy, high-crime area, Mendoza-Ruiz, 225 Ariz. at 476, ¶ 12 , 240 P.3d at 1238 ; and the stop of a vehicle with a defective taillight, ¶¶ 8-10
State v. Jacot 330 P.3d 981 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Jacot 330 P.3d 981 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 12 , (citing Cady v. Dombrowski, 413 U.S. 433, 441 , 93 S.Ct.
State v. Baggett 306 P.3d 81 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Baggett 306 P.3d 81 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State of Arizona v. Guillermo C. Becerra 291 P.3d 994 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Guillermo C. Becerra 291 P.3d 994 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State v. Mendoza-Ruiz, 4 ¶¶ 14-18, (stop of vehicle proper as community caretaking function when reasonable to believe vehicle having trouble); (proper exercise of police power to stop vehicle for public safety reasons because tire “b
State of Arizona v. Aaron Raymond Fikes 267 P.3d 1181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State of Arizona v. Aaron Raymond Fikes 267 P.3d 1181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
See, P.3d 1235 (App. 2010); P.3d 611 (App. 2010).
State v. Mendoza-Ruiz 240 P.3d 1235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State v. Mendoza-Ruiz 240 P.3d 1235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
¶ 12 , (citing Cady v. Dombrowski, 413 U.S. 433, 441 , 93 S.Ct.