Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Martinez, 245 P.3d 906.

34 citing documents.

State v. Schaeffer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Schaeffer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Vaughan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Vaughan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State Kingston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State Kingston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
While such evidence would independently support a finding of substantial evidence, ¶ 14-15 (App. 2011) (small plastic baggies, ledger, or scales), it is not required, id.
State v. Robertson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Robertson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Figueroa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Figueroa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Figueroa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Figueroa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Munoz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Munoz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 17 (App. 2011) (imposition of an illegal sentence is fundamental error).
State v. Carnochan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Carnochan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-24, ¶¶ 11-15, -09 (App. 2011) (sufficient evidence supported conviction for sale of methamphetamine even though evidence was also consistent with possession for personal use; substantial evidence “is not insubstantial simply because reasonable persons might have drawn a different conclusion from
State v. McClain Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. McClain Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Evidence “is not insubstantial simply because reasonable persons might have drawn a different conclusion from the evidence.” ¶ 15, (citations omitted).
State v. Loyd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Loyd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Patron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Patron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Gonzalez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Gonzalez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Shields Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Shields Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
9 STATE v. SHIELDS Decision of the Court fundamental error.” ¶ 17
State v. McDonagh 304 P.3d 212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. McDonagh 304 P.3d 212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
¶ 7 , ¶ 17 , (imposition of consecutive sentences in violation of AR.S.