Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Hamilton, 735 P.2d 854.

68 citing documents.

State v. Evans Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Evans Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Gonzalez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Gonzalez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Because the date of sentencing is not included in the calculation of presentence incarceration credit, Gonzalez was only entitled to 37 days of credit.
State v. Mendoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Mendoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Ruiz Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Ruiz Espinoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
The superior court incorrectly credited Appellant’s night of arrest before she was booked into custody, –16 (App. 1990), and date of sentencing, –46 (App. 1987).
State v. Warax Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Warax Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Because the date of sentencing is not included in the calculation of credit for presentence incarceration, Warax was only entitled to 141 days of credit.
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Yug 501 P.3d 246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Yug 501 P.3d 246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Saldana Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Saldana Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
§ 13-712(B); (holding that a defendant gets a full day of credit even if incarcerated for part of the day); (App. 2 The record before us does not include a presentence report, but it appears all parties had access to it.
State v. Rodvelt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Rodvelt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
(“Where the date sentence is imposed serves .
State v. Wade Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Wade Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Mendivil Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Mendivil Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Bartels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Bartels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Custody commences “when a defendant is booked into a detention facility,” –54 (App. 1993), but does not include the date a sentence is imposed, –46 (App. 1987).
State v. Fears Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Fears Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
A defendant must receive credit for every day or part of a day served, including the day of arrest, but not the day of sentencing, - 46 (App. 1987).
State v. Beard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Beard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Jorgensen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Jorgensen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Presentence incarceration credit is given for time spent in custody beginning on the day of booking, -54 (App. 1993) (citation omitted), and ending on the day before sentencing
State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Galaviz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Galaviz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Ludwig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Ludwig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Cortez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Cortez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Presentence Incarceration Credit ¶17 Presentence incarceration credit is given for time spent in custody beginning on the day of booking, and ending on the day before sentencing
State v. Navarrete Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Navarrete Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Verdugo-Manriquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Verdugo-Manriquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶4 Presentence incarceration credit is given for time spent in custody beginning the day of booking, and ending the day before sentencing
State v. Mitchell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Mitchell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Maestas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Maestas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Cardenas-Salcido Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Cardenas-Salcido Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014