Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Thompson, 270 P.3d 870.

82 citing documents.

State v. Oricho Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Caudle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Chambers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Chambers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
¶2 After reviewing the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 3 (App. 2012), we find none, and affirm Chambers’ conviction and sentence.
State v. Caudle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988); ¶ 3 (App. 2012).
State v. Oricho Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
¶2 We must review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 3 (App. 2012), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Oricho.
State v. Stevenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Stevenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988); ¶ 3 (App. 2012).
State v. Baker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Baker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988); ¶ 3 (App. 2012).
State v. Pacheco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Pacheco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
¶2 We must review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 3 (App. 2012), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Pacheco.
State v. Vazquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Vazquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 3 (App. 2012).
State v. Fullen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Fullen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
This Court has read and considered counsel’s brief and fully reviewed the record for reversible error, ¶ 3 (App. 2012), and finds none.
State v. Lawrence Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Lawrence Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Melendez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Melendez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988); ¶ 3 (App. 2012).
State v. Balderas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Kee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Kee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988); ¶ 3 (App. 2012).
State v. Balderas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988); ¶ 3 (App. 2012).
State v. Robertson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Betrue Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Robertson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988); ¶ 3 (App. 2012).
State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988); ¶ 3 (App. 2012).
State v. Betrue Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988); ¶ 3 (App. 2012).
State v. Astle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Astle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
DISCUSSION ¶6 This court reviews the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 3 (App. 2012), viewing the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Astle, ¶ 2 (App. 1998).
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Ortiz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Ortiz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Mortimer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Mortimer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Gordon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Gordon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
DISCUSSION ¶15 After reviewing the entire record, ¶ 3 (App. 2012), we find no reversible error.
State v. Butler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Butler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Lewis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Lewis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
DISCUSSION ¶14 After reviewing the entire record, ¶ 3 (App. 2012), we find no reversible error.
State v. Olivier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Olivier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Massey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Massey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by