Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Solis, 339 P.3d 668.

69 citing documents.

State v. Castleberry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Bryant Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Bryant Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 6 (App. 2014) ( ¶ 60 (2005)).
State of Arizona v. Jesus Ismael Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
State of Arizona v. Jesus Ismael Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
¶24 A flight instruction may be given if there is evidence of flight after an offense is committed “from which jurors can infer a defendant’s consciousness of guilt.”
State v. Foster 559 P.3d 1139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Foster 559 P.3d 1139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Because Foster’s proposed instruction related only to the charges of which Foster was acquitted anyway, the failure to give the proposed instruction could not have “contribute[d] to or affect[ed] the verdict.” ¶ 13 (App. 2014) (citation omitted).
State v. Merrill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Merrill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Olivas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Olivas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Jaynes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Jaynes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State of Arizona v. Larry James Fournier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
State of Arizona v. Larry James Fournier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
State v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Medlin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Medlin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Teran 510 P.3d 502 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Teran 510 P.3d 502 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Gilligan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Gilligan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Najera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Najera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶9 A flight instruction should only be given where “the State presents evidence of flight after a crime from which jurors can infer a defendant’s consciousness of guilt.” ¶ 7 (App. 2014) ( ¶ 44 (2013)).
Aspen v. Wakefield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Aspen v. Wakefield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
“We review a court’s decision to give a jury instruction for abuse of discretion,” but review de novo “whether the given instruction correctly states the law.” ¶ 6 (App. 2014).
State v. Nelson 492 P.3d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Nelson 492 P.3d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶11 “This court reviews a decision to give a jury instruction for abuse of discretion but reviews de novo whether the instruction correctly states the law.” ¶ 12 (App. 2020) ( ¶ 6 (App. 2014)).
State v. Ricci Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Ricci Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
“We review a court’s decision to give a jury instruction for abuse of discretion,” but review de novo “whether the given instruction correctly states the law.” ¶ 6 (App. 2014).
State v. Lane Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Lane Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 7 (App. 2014); ¶ 44 (2013).
State v. Farid Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Farid Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Woodruff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Woodruff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Bartels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Bartels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 6 (App. 2014); ¶ 60 (2005).
State v. Dustin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Dustin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Morphis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Morphis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. George Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. George Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶9 “A flight instruction should only be given if the State presents evidence of flight after a crime from which jurors can infer a defendant’s consciousness of guilt.” ¶ 7 (App. 2014).
State v. Harris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Harris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Quinerly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Quinerly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
An erroneous instruction is harmless error when, taken as a whole, “the trial evidence, arguments of counsel, and the [jury] instructions” demonstrate “beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to or affect the verdict.” -88, ¶¶ 13-14 (App. 2014); see also State v. Bible, 175 Ariz. 4 STATE v. QUINERLY Decision of the Court 549, 588 (1993) (“We must be confident beyond a reasonable doubt that the error had no influence on the jury’s
State v. Valles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018