Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Mendoza, 455 P.3d 705.

151 citing documents.

State v. Balli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
–21, ¶¶ 32–37 (App. 2019) (superior court’s expression of comments deviating from its role as a neutral arbiter can raise the specter of judicial vindictiveness).
State v. Chayrez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Chayrez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Ricci Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Emedi 484 P.3d 657 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Emedi 484 P.3d 657 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Ricci Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Zinger Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Waldrup Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Waldrup Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Axton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Axton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Castillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Castillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Rothrock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Antone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Rothrock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Antone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Mendivil Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Mendivil Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Veleta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Veleta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Starnes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“The purpose of this doctrine is to prevent a party from injecting error in the record and then profiting from it on appeal.” ¶ 20 (App. 2019) (internal quotations omitted).
State v. Carrillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Carrillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. MacIas 469 P.3d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. MacIas 469 P.3d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
STATE v. MACIAS Opinion of the Court DISCUSSION ¶8 We review the superior court’s denial of post-conviction relief for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 19 (2012), but review the interpretation of the Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure de novo, –15, ¶ 12 (App. 2019).
State v. Wallace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Wallace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Fields Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Fields Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Bilducia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Bilducia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Berhane Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Berhane Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Dixon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Dixon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Soza 464 P.3d 696 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Soza 464 P.3d 696 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Grier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Grier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Cooper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Cooper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Montgomery Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Montgomery Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶9 We review the superior court’s denial of post-conviction relief for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 19 (2012), but review the interpretation of the Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure de 4 STATE v. MONTGOMERY Decision of the Court novo, –15, ¶ 12 (App. 2019).
State v. Norrington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020