Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Yabe, 559 P.2d 209.
-
State v. Vansickel
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
(explaining that “[i]f the statute is facially constitutional our inquiry is at an end, as we are without jurisdiction to review any alleged 2 STATE v. VANSICKEL Decision of the Court unconstitutional appli
- State of Arizona v. James Hamberlin 515 P.3d 159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
-
State of Arizona v. James Hamberlin
515 P.3d 159
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
“If the statute is facially constitutional our inquiry is at an end, as we are without jurisdiction to review any alleged unconstitutional application of the statute.”
- State v. Sibley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Sibley
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 22-375
- State v. Okken 364 P.3d 485 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
State v. Okken
364 P.3d 485
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See, , (considering constitutionality of state obscenity statute).
- State of Arizona v. John Richard Eby Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
-
State of Arizona v. John Richard Eby
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
(concluding § 22-375 limits to specified issues jurisdiction over appeal from trial de novo in superior court on appeal from conviction in justice court).
- State v. Nichols 33 P.3d 1172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
-
State v. Nichols
33 P.3d 1172
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
2246 , 147 L.Ed.2d 326 (2000)
- State v. Crisp 855 P.2d 795 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
- State v. Crisp 855 P.2d 795 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
- State v. Irving 797 P.2d 1237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
-
State v. Irving
797 P.2d 1237
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Anderson, 9 Ariz.App.
- State v. Book-Cellar, Inc. 679 P.2d 548 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- State v. Book-Cellar, Inc. 679 P.2d 548 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- State v. Zack 674 P.2d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State v. Zack 674 P.2d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- Stirewalt v. P.P.G. Industries, Inc. 674 P.2d 320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- Stirewalt v. P.P.G. Industries, Inc. 674 P.2d 320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State v. Wolfe 669 P.2d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
-
State v. Wolfe
669 P.2d 111
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Anderson, 9 Ariz.App.
- State v. Walton 650 P.2d 1264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- State v. Walton 650 P.2d 1264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- State v. Tovar 627 P.2d 702 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
-
State v. Tovar
627 P.2d 702
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
we held that the definition was constitutional.
- State v. Renteria 617 P.2d 543 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
-
State v. Renteria
617 P.2d 543
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
State v. New Times, Inc., 20 Ariz.App.
- State v. Gray 580 P.2d 765 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
- State v. Gray 580 P.2d 765 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
- State v. Arnett 579 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Arnett 579 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Navarrette 566 P.2d 1050 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- State v. Navarrette 566 P.2d 1050 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977