Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Salinas, 532 P.2d 174.

34 citing documents.

State v. Trotter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Trotter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
See, (“Unchallenged information presented by a county probation officer concerning communications and records within the probation department would normally be considered reliable information.”).
State v. Keddy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Keddy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
but neither case involved consecutive sentences.
State v. Orona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Orona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶11 the superior court revoked the defendant's probation based solely on a probation officer's hearsay testimony.
State v. Bartels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Bartels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Stotts 695 P.2d 1110 Ariz. 1985
State v. Stotts 695 P.2d 1110 Ariz. 1985
State v. San Miguel 643 P.2d 1027 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. San Miguel 643 P.2d 1027 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Long 580 P.2d 1181 Ariz. 1978
State v. Long 580 P.2d 1181 Ariz. 1978
State v. Layman 573 P.2d 909 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Layman 573 P.2d 909 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
1 However, , requires that credit for presentence incarceration must be given, if such time, when added to the maximum sentence imposed, will exceed the statutory maximum sentence.
State v. Warde 570 P.2d 766 Ariz. 1977
State v. Warde 570 P.2d 766 Ariz. 1977
2018 , 26 L.Ed.2d 586 (1970) a number of state and federal appellate courts including our Court of Appeals, , , have held that a defendant, as a matter of equal protection, must be credited with presen *601 tence jail time when such time, if added to the maximum sentence imposed, will exceed the maximum statutory sentence.
State v. Harris 570 P.2d 485 Ariz. 1977
State v. Harris 570 P.2d 485 Ariz. 1977
State v. Valenzuela 567 P.2d 1190 Ariz. 1977
State v. Valenzuela 567 P.2d 1190 Ariz. 1977
State v. Hadley 559 P.2d 206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Hadley 559 P.2d 206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Rule 27.7(b), Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S.
State v. Maese 555 P.2d 348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Maese 555 P.2d 348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Flores 552 P.2d 1217 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Flores 552 P.2d 1217 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Flores 549 P.2d 180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Flores 549 P.2d 180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
(probation officer testified that he was informed by the police department that the probationer had been arrested and charged with carrying a weapon) ; , (communications and records within the probation department admitted into evidence).
State v. Belcher 535 P.2d 1297 Ariz. 1975
State v. Belcher 535 P.2d 1297 Ariz. 1975
State v. Brown 532 P.2d 167 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State v. Brown 532 P.2d 167 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
for further discussion of this problem.