Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Gilbert, 837 P.2d 1137.

27 citing documents.

State v. Leota 538 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Leota 538 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Harris v. Mathews Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Harris v. Mathews Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Pritchard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Pritchard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Waits Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Waits Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(holding that court abused discretion by basing dismissal with prejudice solely on generalized finding of desirability of finality).
State v. Goold Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Goold Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
The rule specifically “requires the trial court to make ‘a reasoned finding’ that the interests of justice require the dismissal to be with prejudice.”
State v. Simmons Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Simmons Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
The most important factor is whether the delay in prosecution would result in prejudice to the defendant such that the dismissal would “actually hurt [the defendant’s] ability to defend against the charges.” -05, -40 (App. 1991)
Earl v. Hon. garcia/state 324 P.3d 863 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State of Arizona v. Ramon Limon 270 P.3d 849 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State of Arizona v. Ramon Limon 270 P.3d 849 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
(state may appeal only from order of dismissal going beyond what it requested).
State of Arizona v. Joshua Paul Eugene Huffman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
State of Arizona v. Joshua Paul Eugene Huffman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
In re Arnulfo G. 71 P.3d 916 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
In re Arnulfo G. 71 P.3d 916 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State v. GONZALES-PEREZ 62 P.3d 126 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State v. GONZALES-PEREZ 62 P.3d 126 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County 868 P.2d 350 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County 868 P.2d 350 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Wills 870 P.2d 410 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Wills 870 P.2d 410 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
for its contention that the type of cursory finding made by the trial court in this case, without more, is insufficient to support a conclusion that dismissal with prejudice is, in fact, in the interests of justice.
State v. Granados 837 P.2d 1140 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State v. Granados 837 P.2d 1140 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991