DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Perez, 836 P.2d 1000.

31 citing documents.

  • State v. Walls-Bey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    -93 (App. 1992) (appellate court has discretion to consider a matter as a special action).
  • Red Moon v. Kreitzman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Red Moon v. Kreitzman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • State of Arizona v. James Hamberlin 515 P.3d 159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
  • State of Arizona v. James Hamberlin 515 P.3d 159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
    -93 (App. 1992) (discretion to consider matter as special action).
  • State v. Domas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • State v. Domas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    ¶3 “Although we do not have appellate jurisdiction to review this issue, it is within our discretion to consider the matter as a special action.”
  • Lozano v. Pacco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Lozano v. Pacco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    Credit Union v. Yuma Funding, Inc., ¶ 21 (App. 2015) ().
  • A.R. v. Dcs, Jessica S. 439 P.3d 1183 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • A.R. v. Dcs, Jessica S. 439 P.3d 1183 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Even if jurisdiction by appeal is lacking, this court has the “discretion to consider the matter as a special action.” ¶ 35 (App. 2001) (sua sponte accepting special action jurisdiction).
  • Daniel L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Daniel L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    Even if appellate jurisdiction is lacking, this court has the “discretion to consider the matter as a special action.” ¶ 35, 36 (App. 2001) (sua sponte 3Absent material revisions after the relevant dates, statutes and rules cited refer to the current version unless otherwise indicated.
  • AEA Federal Credit Union v. Yuma Funding, Inc. 346 P.3d 991 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • AEA Federal Credit Union v. Yuma Funding, Inc. 346 P.3d 991 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    When we lack appellate jurisdiction, “it is within our discretion to consider the matter as a special action.” , ( , ); see also A.R.S.
  • Phoenix v. Cortes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Phoenix v. Cortes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    it is within our discretion to consider the matter as a special action.” ( ); see also A.R.S.
  • State v. Liberty Bail Bonds 314 P.3d 820 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
  • State v. Liberty Bail Bonds 314 P.3d 820 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
    shall be pronounced and entered together with the sentence.”); , (acceptance of guilty plea not an entry of final judgment; “[¡judgment is not final until it is orally pronounced and entered in the court’s minutes.”).
  • State of Arizona v. Brady Whitman Jr. 301 P.3d 226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
  • State of Arizona v. Brady Whitman Jr. 301 P.3d 226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
    Bolding, , (“A judgment of conviction is final only when a verdict has been rendered, whether by jury or the trial court after a bench trial, and sentence has been ‘orally *63 pronounced in open court and entered on the clerk’s minutes.’”), , 267 n. 2, , 1085 n. 2 (App. 1990); , (“Judgment is not final until it is orally pronounced and entered in the court’s minutes.”).
  • KOOL RADIATORS, INC. v. Evans 278 P.3d 310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
  • KOOL RADIATORS, INC. v. Evans 278 P.3d 310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
  • State v. Saenz 4 P.3d 1030 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
  • State v. Saenz 4 P.3d 1030 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
    P. 26.1 and 26.2 (defining judgment and sentence and setting forth time for entry of same upon a finding of guilt); , (court of appeals lacked jurisdiction under § 13-4033 to review imposition of felony assessment penalty absent entry of judgment of conviction).
  • Lloyd v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 943 P.2d 729 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
  • Lloyd v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 943 P.2d 729 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
    (court may grant relief by special action even though motion or writ is inappropriately titled); , (“[although we do not have appellate jurisdiction to review this issue, it is within our discretion to consider the matter as a special action”); A.R.S.
  • State v. Hovey 854 P.2d 1205 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
  • State v. Hovey 854 P.2d 1205 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
    Rule 1, Rules of Procedure for Special Actions.
  • State v. Green 844 P.2d 631 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
  • State v. Green 844 P.2d 631 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
    the defendant entered a guilty plea to a charge of attempted kidnapping, a class 3 felony.