Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Stevens, 844 P.2d 661.

80 citing documents.

  • State v. Inoue Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
  • State v. Backus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    10 STATE v. BACKUS Decision of the Court G. Presentence Credit ¶34 “A defendant is entitled to presentence incarceration credit for all time spent in custody pursuant to an offense.” –96 (App. 1992); see also A.R.S.
  • State v. Miguel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • State v. Miguel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    (correcting a defendant’s presentence incarceration credit).
  • State v. Yug 501 P.3d 246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • State v. Yug 501 P.3d 246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    P. 31.19(c) (permitting the appellate court to modify the action of a lower court); (amending sentencing order to correct presentence incarceration credit without remand).
  • State v. Kelley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • State v. Kelley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • State v. Laws Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • State v. Laws Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    § 13-4037(A) (authorizing correction of sentence on appeal); see also Rule 31.19(c) (permitting appellate court to order modification of lower court’s action); (modifying sentence to amend presentence incarceration credit without remand).
  • State v. Lemons Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • State v. Lemons Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    (“Upon finding a discrepancy between the oral pronouncement of sentence and a minute entry, a reviewing court must try to ascertain the trial court’s intent by reference to the record.”).
  • State v. Dean Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Dean Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    -96 (App. 1992) (correcting presentence incarceration credit by modifying sentence without remanding).
  • State v. Mynatt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • State v. Mynatt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • State v. Ramos-Ramirez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • State v. Ramos-Ramirez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    (permitting this court to correct a clerical sentencing error without remanding to the superior court).
  • State v. Ingram Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • State v. Ingram Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    (correcting the minute entry to reflect the court’s oral pronouncement).
  • State v. Norris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • State v. Norris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    -96 (App. 1992) (correcting a miscalculation in presentence 3 STATE v. NORRIS Decision of the Court incarceration credit by modifying the sentence without remanding to the trial court).
  • State v. Pino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • State v. Pino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    -96 (App. 1992) (correcting a miscalculation in presentence incarceration credit by modifying the sentence without remanding to the trial court).
  • State v. Griego Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Griego Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    P. 31.17(b); (modifying the defendant’s sentence to reflect correct presentence incarceration credit).
  • State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    P. 31.17(b); (modifying sentence to reflect correct presentence incarceration credit).
  • State v. Cryer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Cryer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Webb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Webb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    § 13-4037; –96, –63 (App. 1992) (correcting presentence incarceration credit without remanding to the trial court).
  • State v. Whitlock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Whitlock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    P. 31.17(b); –96 (App. 1992) (modifying sentence to reflect correct presentence incarceration credit).
  • State v. Sullivan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Sullivan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    (noting that when a discrepancy exists between the oral pronouncement of sentence and a minute entry, a reviewing court must try to ascertain the trial court's intent by reference to the record) (internal citation omitted).
  • State v. Mendoza-Saravia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Mendoza-Saravia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    (correcting presentence incarceration credit without remand to trial court.)
  • State v. Walker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Walker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Mattison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Mattison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    P. 31.17(b); -96 (App. 1992) (modifying an award of presentence incarceration credit without remand to superior court).
  • State v. Cramer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Cramer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    P. 31.17(b); –96 (App. 1992) (correcting a miscalculation in credit by modifying the sentence without remanding to the trial court).
  • State v. Alvarado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Alvarado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    P. 31.17(b); –96 (App. 1992) (correcting a miscalculation in credit by modifying the sentence without remanding to the trial court).
  • State v. Gonzalez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Gonzalez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    (correcting presentence incarceration credit without remand to trial court).