Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Carnegie, 850 P.2d 690.

66 citing documents.

State v. Headrick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Headrick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See Seay, 232 Ariz. at 148, ¶ 7; see also 4 (for purposes of presentence incarceration credit, custody begins upon a defendant’s booking).
State v. Saldana Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Saldana Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
§ 13-712(B); (holding that a defendant gets a full day of credit even if incarcerated for part of the day); (App. 2 The record before us does not include a presentence report, but it appears all parties had access to it.
State v. Wade Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Wade Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
“[F]or purposes of presentence incarceration credit, ‘custody’ begins when a defendant is booked into a detention facility.” -54 (App. 1993).
State v. Mendivil Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Mendivil Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“[F]or purposes of presentence incarceration credit, ‘custody’ begins when a defendant is booked into a detention facility.”
State v. Bartels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Bartels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
For the purposes of the statute, “’custody’ begins when a defendant is booked into a detention facility.”
State v. Douglas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Douglas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Finally, when calculating presentence incarceration credit, a defendant is entitled to a full day of credit for any partial day in custody, but no credit for the day of sentencing.
State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Custody commences “when a defendant is booked into a detention facility,” –54 (App. 1993), but does not include the date a sentence is imposed, –46 (App. 1987).
State v. Fears Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Fears Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
A defendant must receive credit for every day or part of a day served, including the day of arrest, but not the day of sentencing, - 46 (App. 1987).
Bsi v. Adot 399 P.3d 696 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Bsi v. Adot 399 P.3d 696 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
1933) (“It is the common-law rule that judicially a day is the whole or any part of the period of twenty-four hours, from midnight to midnight.”); (rejecting contention a defendant must be in custody “for a full twenty-four hours” to receive pre-sentence incarceration credit for a particular day).
State v. Cryer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Cryer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Cunningham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Cunningham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-54, -92 (App. 1993) (citation omitted).
State v. Jorgensen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Jorgensen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Presentence incarceration credit is given for time spent in custody beginning on the day of booking, -54 (App. 1993) (citation omitted), and ending on the day before sentencing
State v. Zamora Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Zamora Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(holding a court must award a defendant presentence incarceration credit “from and including the day of booking”).
State v. Whitlock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Whitlock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
A defendant is entitled to a full day of credit for any partial day in custody, but no credit for the day of sentencing.
State v. Porter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Porter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(holding that presentence incarceration credit includes the day of booking).
State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Dickenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Dickenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Drew Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Drew Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Jude Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Jude Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Galaviz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Galaviz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
The State concedes Appellant was incarcerated during this period, with the exception of April 14.9 The record regarding this issue is not a model of clarity, and the available documents could reasonably be read to support 8 Custody commences when a defendant is booked into a detention facility, -54, -92 (App. 1993), but does not include the date sentence is imposed.
State v. Ludwig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Ludwig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Presentence Incarceration Credit ¶17 Presentence incarceration credit is given for time spent in custody beginning on the day of booking, and ending on the day before sentencing.
State v. Cortez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Cortez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Presentence Incarceration Credit ¶17 Presentence incarceration credit is given for time spent in custody beginning on the day of booking, and ending on the day before sentencing
State v. Gonzalez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Gonzalez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
§ 13–712(B), a defendant is entitled to credit for all time that is “actually spent in custody.” For the purposes of that statute, a defendant is in custody beginning at the time of “actual incarceration in a prison or jail, not simply a restraint on one’s freedom.”
State v. Navarrete Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Navarrete Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Verdugo-Manriquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Verdugo-Manriquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶4 Presentence incarceration credit is given for time spent in custody beginning the day of booking, and ending the day before sentencing