Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Noriega, 928 P.2d 706.

113 citing documents.

State v. Gonzales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Indeed, we have held that “in a prosecution for accomplice liability based on actual presence, the trial judge must, if requested, give a mere presence instruction.”
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Snethen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Snethen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See, ( vacated in part on other grounds, ) (“Guilt cannot be established by the defendant’s mere presence at a crime scene or mere association with another person at a crime scene.
State v. Green Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Green Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶7 A defendant’s mental state “will be rarely provable by direct evidence.”
State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
The fact that the defendant may have been present does not in and of itself make the defendant guilty of the crimes charged.” (citation omitted).
State v. Barlow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Barlow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. McKenzie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. McKenzie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
ie’s objection for this very reason when the State asked one of the investigators, “So in your opinion, if you have two fires in the same place in a very short period of time, what does that basically show [about] the intent of the person who is involved in these fires?” ¶6 Moreover, evidence of a person’s mental state “will rarely be provable by direct evidence.”
State v. Estes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Estes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(citation omitted), unless that instruction is adequately covered by other instructions, or is misleading to the jury
State v. Woody Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Woody Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶33 “The purpose of jury instructions is to inform the jury of the applicable law in understandable terms.”
State v. Patron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Patron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See State v. 10 (providing that instructions need not be faultless, but it must give jurors an understanding of the issues and must not mislead them).
State v. Hafen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Hafen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Cornman 351 P.3d 357 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Cornman 351 P.3d 357 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 17 “The purpose of jury instructions is to inform the jury of the applicable law.”
State v. Abbott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Abbott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶20 “The purpose of jury instructions is to inform the jury of the applicable law in understandable terms.”
State v. Raimonde Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Raimonde Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Dyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Dyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Oman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Oman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Craft Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Craft Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State of Arizona v. Jesus Xavier Almaguer 303 P.3d 84 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Jesus Xavier Almaguer 303 P.3d 84 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
(purpose of jury instructions to inform jury of applicable law in understandable terms; “instructions are, in essence, a guide to the proper verdict”); (jury should be given both self-defense and manslaughter instr
State v. Bayardi 281 P.3d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
State v. Bayardi 281 P.3d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
§ 13-201 (proof of "voluntary act” is a "minimum requirement for criminal liability”); -87 , -11 (App.1996) (discussing “mere presence doctrine”).
State v. Abdi 248 P.3d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State v. Abdi 248 P.3d 209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State of Arizona v. Daniel Oliveri Michael Joseph Nelson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State v. Miller 245 P.3d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State of Arizona v. Daniel Oliveri Michael Joseph Nelson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
¶8 “The purpose of jury instructions is to inform the jury of the applicable law in understandable terms.”
State v. Miller 245 P.3d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
¶ 8 “The purpose of jury instructions is to inform the jury of the applicable law in understandable terms.”
State v. FAR WEST WATER & SEWER INC. 228 P.3d 909 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State v. FAR WEST WATER & SEWER INC. 228 P.3d 909 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State v. Karr 212 P.3d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
State v. Karr 212 P.3d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
“The purpose of jury instrue- *323 tions is to inform the jury of the applicable law in understandable terms.”
State v. Rios 172 P.3d 844 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by