Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Noriega, 928 P.2d 706.

113 citing documents.

State v. Rios 172 P.3d 844 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Prasertphong 75 P.3d 675 Ariz. 2003
State v. Prasertphong 75 P.3d 675 Ariz. 2003
State v. (Pedro) Noriega
State v. Rosas-Hernandez 42 P.3d 1177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
State v. Rosas-Hernandez 42 P.3d 1177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Mere Presence Instruction ¶ 28 Defense counsel requested that the court give the following “mere presence” instruction, , : Guilt cannot be established by the defendant’s mere presence at a crime scene or mere association with another person at a crime scene.
State v. Rutledge 4 P.3d 444 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State v. Rutledge 4 P.3d 444 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
The instructions given “need not be faultless.”
State v. Doerr 969 P.2d 1168 Ariz. 1998
State v. Doerr 969 P.2d 1168 Ariz. 1998
¶ 37 Defendant’s , is misplaced.
State v. Dominguez 967 P.2d 136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Dominguez 967 P.2d 136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Aro 937 P.2d 711 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
State v. Aro 937 P.2d 711 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997