Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Valencia, 924 P.2d 497.

283 citing documents.

State v. Crawford Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Crawford Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction[] with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” ¶ 2 n.2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Gipson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Gipson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶2 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” ¶ 2 n.2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Botsford Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Botsford Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
2 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction[] with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” ¶ 2 n.2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Workum Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Workum Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
At some point, Workum advised Chad that “if [Shiner] 1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” ¶ 2 n.2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Amey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Amey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” ¶ 2 n.2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Hand Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Hand Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 2, n.2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Bieganski Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Frazer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Frazer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 2, n.2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Bieganski Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 2, n.2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” ¶ 2 n.2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Getscher Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Dustin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Dustin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Getscher Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction[] with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” ¶ 2 n.2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Coleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Coleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Burrows Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Burrows Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Taylor v. Illinois, 484 U.S. 400, 411-15 (1988); Delgado, 174 Ariz. at 257.
State v. Frazer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Frazer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 2, n.2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
At the sentencing hearing, the trial court revoked Garcia’s probation, sentenced him to a mitigated term of 1.5 years’ imprisonment for the 2011 offense, and 1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” ¶ 2 n.2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” ¶ 2 n.2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Noriega Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Wadi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Noriega Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
The jury convicted Noriega of 1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” ¶ 2 n.2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Wadi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Lewis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Lewis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 2, n.2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Pintarich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Pintarich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶3 The State charged Pintarich with one count of possession of a dangerous drug for sale (methamphetamine), one count of possession of a 1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” ¶ 2 n.2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Koryor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Koryor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
2 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” ¶ 2 n.2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Castillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Castillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 2, n.2 (App. 2015) ().
State v. Hartwell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Hartwell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Riley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Riley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019