Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Valencia, 924 P.2d 497.
- State v. Bryant Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
State v. Bryant
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 2, n.2 (App. 2015) ().
- State v. Crews Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- State v. Crews Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- State v. Majenty Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
State v. Williams
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
The State charged 1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” ¶ 2 n.2 (App. 2015) ().
-
State v. Majenty
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
According to Majenty, she had been drinking alcohol at her aunt’s home in Peach Springs earlier in the day and then found herself in the trailer, where she 1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction[] with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” ¶ 2 n.2 (App. 2015) ().
- State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- State v. Skaro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Woods
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
- State v. Skaro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- State v. Dulin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Dulin
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
yed the video of Dulin stealing the laptop for the jury as the police officer narrated and presented still photographs, taken from the surveillance video, along with 1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction[] with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” ¶ 2 n.2 (App. 2015) ().
- State v. Yellowhair Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- State v. Yellowhair Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- State v. Murray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- State v. Elise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Murray
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” ¶ 2 n.2 (App. 2015) ().
-
State v. Elise
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Due Process ¶3 Elise argues the trial court violated her due process rights by relying upon a ruling preventing her codefendants from raising a defense 1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” ¶ 2 n.2 (App. 2015) ().
- State v. Lockett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Lockett
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
nal activity.” ¶3 In March 2017, the State charged Lockett with two counts of sale or transportation of marijuana, alleging Lockett sold marijuana to an 1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” ¶ 2 n.2 (App. 2015) ().
- State v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Robinson
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
1“We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.”
- State v. Franco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- State v. Franco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- State v. Antwine Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Antwine
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 2, n.2 (App. 2015) ().
- State v. Scalph Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- State v. Lamb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Scalph
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
n.2, ¶ 3 (App. 2015) ().
-
State v. Lamb
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
The court further advised: 1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction[] with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
- State v. Perkins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Perkins
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
- State v. Phillips Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- State v. Phillips Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- State v. Walker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Walker
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
The first detective wore a tactical vest identifying 1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
- State v. Mullet Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- State v. Mullet Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- State v. Dahl Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Dahl
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
A notebook discovered on the property contained the names of Rick’s 1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction[] with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
- State v. Sibley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Sibley
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 2, n.2 (App. 2015) ().
- State v. Ramirez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Ramirez
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions with all reasonable inferences resolved against the defendant.” n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
- State v. Bush Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Bush
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().
- State v. Francois Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
State v. Francois
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
n.2, ¶ 2 (App. 2015) ().