Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Clark, 2 P.3d 89.

1298 citing documents.

State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
State v. Miramontes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Miramontes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
State v. Zermeno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Zermeno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Zermeno
State v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Rice Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Rice Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Roberts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Roberts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Moreno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Moreno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Graff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Ortega Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Jacquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Graff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 36 (App. 1999) (in an Anders appeal, “the court itself reviews the record for reversible error”).
State v. Ortega Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 284 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
State v. Jacquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (explaining that, after receiving an “Anders brief,” this Court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Marks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Marks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Eisenmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Eisenmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Segura Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Segura Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Safely Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Safely Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Monyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Monyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 36 (App. 1999) (in an Anders appeal, “the court itself reviews the record for reversible error”).
State v. Martin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Mynatt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Martin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
We have considered the issues raised by Martin’s pro per supplemental brief, and we have searched the record for fundamental error.1 See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Mynatt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Carter 429 P.3d 1176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Carter 429 P.3d 1176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and State v. Clark , , stating she had reviewed the record and found no arguable question of law to raise on appeal.
State v. Reidhead Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Reidhead Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Barnes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Barnes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Washington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Berthold Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Washington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Berthold Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Ackerman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Ackerman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
State v. Wolter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Wolter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating that this Court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018