Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Clark, 2 P.3d 89.

1298 citing documents.

State v. Martineau Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 284 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
State v. Meegan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Meegan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Dean Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Dean Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Kennell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Kennell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 284 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Drummond Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Drummond Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 284 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
State v. Bernal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Bernal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Morales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Morales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
In Re Brandon M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
In Re Brandon M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (explaining that, after receiving an “Anders brief,” this Court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Griffiths Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Griffiths Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 284 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Johnson
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
In Re Castillo C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
In Re Castillo C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Diaz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Diaz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Diaz
State v. Pacheco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Pacheco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Lomeli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Lomeli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
In Re Humberto S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
In Re Humberto S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Maricopa County Juv.
State v. Paulson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Paulson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 36 (App. 1999) (in an Anders appeal, “the court itself reviews the record for reversible error”).
State v. Irvin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Defendant was given the opportunity to file a supplemental brief but did not do so.1 We now review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Cruz
State v. Irvin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738
State v. Walters Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Walters Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
We now review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Walters.
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Walker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Walker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (providing guidelines for briefs when counsel has determined no arguable issues to appeal); Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300.