Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Clark, 2 P.3d 89.

1310 citing documents.

State v. Rodgers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Leon, 104 3 STATE v. RODGERS Decision of the Court Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Gardner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Gardner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Daniels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Daniels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Kroll Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Kroll Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Henderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Henderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Eddins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Eddins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Martineau Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Martineau Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 284 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
State v. Meegan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Meegan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Dean Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Dean Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Kennell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Kennell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 284 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Drummond Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Drummond Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 284 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
State v. Bernal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Bernal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Morales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Morales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
In Re Brandon M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
In Re Brandon M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (explaining that, after receiving an “Anders brief,” this Court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Griffiths Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Griffiths Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 284 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Johnson
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
In Re Castillo C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
In Re Castillo C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Diaz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Diaz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Diaz
State v. Pacheco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Pacheco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Lomeli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Lomeli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
In Re Humberto S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
In Re Humberto S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Maricopa County Juv.
State v. Paulson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by