Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Clark, 2 P.3d 89.

1310 citing documents.

  • State v. Kornack Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • State v. Singleton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Singleton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • State v. Pena Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Villa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Villa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • State v. Pena Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Timlick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 284 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
  • State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 284 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
  • State v. Timlick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • In Re Kenai C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • In Re Kenai C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738; In re JV-117258, -88 (App. 1989).
  • State v. Nelson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Nelson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    ¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
  • State v. White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 284 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
  • State v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Dominguez
  • State v. Newell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Newell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Newell
  • State v. Steed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Steed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    ¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
  • State v. Villa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Villa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Saulsberry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Saulsberry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • State v. Boldan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Boldan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 284 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
  • State v. Harvey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Harvey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Reed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Harvey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Harvey
  • State v. Reed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Reed
  • State v. Harvey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Harvey
  • State v. Collier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Bryant Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Collier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • State v. Bryant Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Padilla Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Padilla Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 284 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
  • State v. Murphy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Murphy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Carter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Johnson
  • State v. Carter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Carter
  • State v. Rodgers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019