Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Clark, 2 P.3d 89.

1310 citing documents.

State v. Lindsey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Wallace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
We also have an independent obligation to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Wallace.
State v. Lindsey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Lindsey
State v. Dressig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Dressig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Stables Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Stables Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Mason Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Arellano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Arellano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Arellano
State v. Mason Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 284 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
In Re Augustine M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
In Re Augustine M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738; JV-117258, -88 (App. 1989).
State v. Giron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Giron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Gibson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Gibson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Standard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Standard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Standard.
State v. Reilly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Reilly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Lynch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Lynch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Martinez
State v. Dunn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Behlke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Behlke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Dunn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 284 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Mendoza 455 P.3d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Mendoza 455 P.3d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Lester Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Lester Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Lester
State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (providing guidelines for briefs when counsel has determined no arguable issues to appeal).
State v. Maddux Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Maddux Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Maddux
State v. Nash Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Nash Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Harrison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Harrison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (providing guidelines for briefs when counsel has determined no arguable issues to appeal).
State v. Herrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Herrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Eschrich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Eschrich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 284 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
State v. Kornack Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019