Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Clark, 2 P.3d 89.

1298 citing documents.

  • In Re Augustine M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738; JV-117258, -88 (App. 1989).
  • State v. Giron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • State v. Giron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • State v. Gibson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Gibson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • State v. Standard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Standard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Standard.
  • State v. Reilly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Reilly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    ¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
  • State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Lynch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Lynch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    ¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
  • State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Martinez
  • State v. Dunn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Behlke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Behlke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • State v. Dunn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 284 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • State v. Mendoza 455 P.3d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Mendoza 455 P.3d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • State v. Lester Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Lester Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Lester
  • State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    ¶ 30 (App. 1999) (providing guidelines for briefs when counsel has determined no arguable issues to appeal).
  • State v. Maddux Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Maddux Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Maddux
  • State v. Nash Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Nash Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • State v. Harrison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Harrison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    ¶ 30 (App. 1999) (providing guidelines for briefs when counsel has determined no arguable issues to appeal).
  • State v. Herrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Herrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • State v. Eschrich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • State v. Eschrich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 284 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
  • State v. Kornack Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Kornack Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • State v. Singleton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Singleton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • State v. Pena Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Villa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Villa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • State v. Pena Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Timlick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 284 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
  • State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 284 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744