Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Clark, 2 P.3d 89.

1298 citing documents.

State v. Carrillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Molina Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Molina Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Fields Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Having reviewed the entire record and considered the supplemental brief, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), we find no reversible error and affirm.
State v. Fields Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Carter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Joyce Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Joyce Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Carter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Kelly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Kelly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Kelly
State v. Fronczak Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Garso Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Garso Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Garso
State v. Fronczak Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Cooper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Cooper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Arellano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Arellano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Figueroa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Figueroa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 284 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Angsuco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Angsuco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Jennings Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Jennings Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 30 (App. 1990) (providing guidelines for briefs when counsel has determined no arguable issues to appeal).
State v. Bullard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Bullard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Shelton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Shelton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Shelton
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Lopez-Pena Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Carter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Carter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (providing guidelines for briefs when 3 In December 2019, Carter admitted to violating probation and was sentenced to concurrent prison terms on the felony convictions, the longest of which was one-and-a-half years.
State v. Lopez-Pena Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Wallace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Lindsey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Wallace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
We also have an independent obligation to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Wallace.
State v. Lindsey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Lindsey
State v. Dressig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Dressig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Stables Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Stables Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Mason Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Arellano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Arellano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Arellano
State v. Mason Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 284 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
In Re Augustine M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020