Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Clark, 2 P.3d 89.

1310 citing documents.

State v. Menyongari Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Phillips Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Menyongari Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 30 (App. 1990) (providing guidelines for briefs when counsel has determined no arguable issues to appeal).
State v. Peacey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Peacey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Owen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Owen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Poteet Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Poteet Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Rogers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Rogers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Santos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Santos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Having reviewed the entire record, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), we find no reversible error and affirm as modified.
State v. Nunez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Black Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Nunez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Black Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Having reviewed the entire record, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), we find no reversible error and affirm.
State v. Axton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Axton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Moore
State v. Aston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Aston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Lunt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Lunt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 30 (App. 1990) (providing guidelines for briefs when counsel has determined no arguable issues to appeal).
State v. Carter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Carter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (providing guidelines for briefs when counsel has determined no arguable issues to appeal).
State v. Samora Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Samora Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Artishon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Artishon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Having reviewed the entire record, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), we find no reversible error and affirm.
State v. Rogers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Rogers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Collins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Salmon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Collins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
DISCUSSION ¶7 Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Thomas
State v. Salmon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Salmon
State v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Nimer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Matz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Matz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Nimer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Holgate Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Holgate Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Holgate
In Re Priscila O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020