Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Clark, 2 P.3d 89.

1298 citing documents.

State v. George Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Kelley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Kelley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. George Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against the defendant
State v. Lebian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Wagner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Wagner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
P. 32.2(a)(3); ¶ 30 (App. 1999) (in cases where defense counsel files an Anders brief, this court’s procedure ensures the defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is protected).
In Re Ulises A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
In Re Ulises A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 30 (App. 1999); JV-117258, 163 Ariz. at 485–88.
State v. King Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. King Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Perryman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Perryman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Perryman
State v. Saldana Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Saldana Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Saldana
State v. Laris Laris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Nevarez-Laboy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Laris Laris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Laris Laris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Laris Laris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Nevarez-Laboy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Defendant
State v. Billingsley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Hayes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Lagunas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Billingsley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Hayes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Lagunas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Davis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Davis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Rodvelt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Rodvelt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
DISCUSSION ¶7 Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Rodvelt
State v. Zinger Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Menyongari Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Zinger Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Menyongari Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 30 (App. 1990) (providing guidelines for briefs when counsel has determined there are no arguable issues to appeal).
State v. Phillips Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Menyongari Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Phillips Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Menyongari Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 30 (App. 1990) (providing guidelines for briefs when counsel has determined no arguable issues to appeal).
State v. Peacey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Peacey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Owen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Owen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Poteet Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Poteet Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Rogers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Rogers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Santos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by