Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Clark, 2 P.3d 89.

1298 citing documents.

State v. Mendoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Gwen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Clark Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Gwen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶ 30 (App. 1990) (providing guidelines for briefs when counsel has determined no arguable issues to appeal).
State v. Clark Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Missell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Missell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Chee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Chee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Mills Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Mills Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. McKenna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. McKenna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against McKenna
State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Campbell
State v. Bowdish Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Hilton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Bowdish Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Hilton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Carrasco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Carrasco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Pete Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Pete Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Riggins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Riggins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Seda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Seda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Halterman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Halterman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Hanss Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Hanss Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (providing guidelines for briefs when counsel has determined no arguable issues to appeal).
State v. Waters Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Waters Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (providing guidelines for briefs when counsel has determined no arguable issues to appeal).
State v. Mohamed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Mohamed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Mohamed
State v. Billie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Billie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Billie
State v. Stevens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Hitchcock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Hitchcock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Hitchcock
State v. Stevens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Walter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Walter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Jaime Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Jaime Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Jaime
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Johnson
State v. Glasscock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Glasscock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Glasscock
State v. Lebian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by