Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Clark, 2 P.3d 89.

1298 citing documents.

State v. Neel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Lester Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Lester Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Vigil Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Vigil Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Gomez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Gomez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Molina Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Molina Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Maloney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Maloney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Mello Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
In Re Carson Y. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Mello Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Mello
In Re Carson Y. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. McClain Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. McClain Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Quarmby Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Grigsby Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Grigsby Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Quarmby Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Martinez-Tapia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Martinez-Tapia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Herrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Herrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
The defendant, Juan Herrera, was given the opportunity to file a supplemental brief, but did not do so.1 Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Herrera
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Hill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Hill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Ruelas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Ruelas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶2 Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Ruelas.
State v. Beatte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Haley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Beatte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Haley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Haley
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
This filing triggered our review of the entire record for reversible error, which ensures that a “defendant’s constitutional rights to due process, equal protection, and effective assistance of counsel are protected.” ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Wright.
State v. Munoz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Munoz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Krick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Krick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
DISCUSSION ¶7 Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Krick
State v. Dixson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Dixson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶ 30 (App. 1999) (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Castillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Castillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Castillo
State v. Dakins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Dakins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See Leon, 104 Ariz. at 299-300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Mendoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022