Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Clark, 2 P.3d 89.

1298 citing documents.

  • State v. Graves Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • State v. Knapp Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Knapp Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • State v. Bibbs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Bibbs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • State v. Patten Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Patten Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Melendez 535 P.3d 16 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Melendez 535 P.3d 16 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Melendez
  • State v. Vargas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Vargas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Riggins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Riggins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • State v. Moreno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Moreno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    Defendant Salvador Hilario Moreno was given the opportunity to file a supplemental brief and has done so.2 Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Moreno
  • State v. Heydorn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Heydorn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    ¶ 30 (App. 1999) (providing guidelines for briefs when counsel has determined no arguable issues to appeal).
  • State v. Cramer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Cramer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • State v. Haguma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Kyle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Kyle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • State v. Haguma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Ramirez-Vazquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Ramirez-Vazquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Groves Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Groves Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • State v. Kemp Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Scott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Scott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Kemp Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Kemp
  • State v. Munoz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Munoz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • State v. Navarrette Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Navarrette Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
  • State v. Beck Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Beck Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Rivas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Rivas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Bermudez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Bermudez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the convictions and resolving all reasonable inferences against Bermudez
  • State v. Mello Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Mello Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Mello
  • State v. Garland Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Mora Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Mora Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    ¶ 30 (App. 1999); (reviewing sentencing order as an Anders appeal).
  • State v. Garland Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    Our obligation is to review the entire record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction and resolving all reasonable inferences against Garland
  • State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Neel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023