Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Clark, 2 P.3d 89.

1298 citing documents.

State v. Yazzie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. McGhee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738
State v. Chavez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 30, (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Mejia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Mejia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Sherod Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Sherod Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Counsel for Sherod filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Jorgensen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Jorgensen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Galvan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Galvan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Buzani Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Buzani Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738
State v. Martinez-Romero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Branin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Joyce Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Martinez-Romero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 30, (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Joyce Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Branin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Ginorio Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Ginorio Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
In Re Tyler D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 30, (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
In Re Tyler D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
After reviewing the record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), we affirm.
State v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Culver Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Culver Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
a, (3) whether collateral estoppel precluded the State from refiling the money laundering charge, (4) whether the court violated his speedy trial rights, and (5) whether the court improperly denied his requests for hearings and for expert witnesses.1 ¶3 After considering the issues raised in Culver’s supplemental brief and searching the record for reversible error, ¶ 30 (App. 1999), we affirm his conviction and sentence.
State v. Eagleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Eagleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Hawthorne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Hawthorne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Kinney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Kinney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Counsel for Kinney filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Lares-Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Lares-Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Deans Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶2 Our obligation in this appeal is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Deans Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶2 Our obligation in this appeal is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Gonzalez-Morales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Gonzalez-Morales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Coffelt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Coffelt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
dangerous drugs (methamphetamine) for sale, a class 2 non-dangerous felony; Count 2, possession of drug paraphernalia (methamphetamine), a class 6 non-dangerous felony; and Count 3, possession of marijuana, a class 6 non-dangerous felony, and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment.1 Counsel for Coffelt filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Lomeli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Lomeli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Coronado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016