Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Clark, 2 P.3d 89.

1310 citing documents.

State v. Deans Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶2 Our obligation in this appeal is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Deans Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶2 Our obligation in this appeal is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Gonzalez-Morales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Gonzalez-Morales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Coffelt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Coffelt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
dangerous drugs (methamphetamine) for sale, a class 2 non-dangerous felony; Count 2, possession of drug paraphernalia (methamphetamine), a class 6 non-dangerous felony; and Count 3, possession of marijuana, a class 6 non-dangerous felony, and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment.1 Counsel for Coffelt filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Lomeli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Lomeli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Coronado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Coronado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 30, (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Miles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Miles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
State v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶2 Our obligation in this appeal is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Zamora Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Zamora Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶2 Our obligation in this appeal is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Perez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Perez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Cote Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Cote Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 30, (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. MacDonald Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. MacDonald Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 30, (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Badertscher Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Badertscher Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300; ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Mothershead Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Mothershead Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See Anders, 386 U.S. 738; Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000)
State v. Salinas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Salinas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Summers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Summers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 30, (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Colorado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Bartels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Colorado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738
State v. Bartels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶2 Our obligation in this appeal is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Peterkin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Arvallo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Chandler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Peterkin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738
State v. Chandler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 30, (stating this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Arvallo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶2 Our obligation in this appeal is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Arter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Matta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Matta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Arter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶2 Our obligation in this appeal is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Ottar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Ottar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 30, (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Clayborn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016