Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Clark, 2 P.3d 89.

1298 citing documents.

State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Armstrong Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶2 Our obligation in this appeal is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 30, (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Cobb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Cobb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 30, (stating that this court searches the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Montelongo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Walters Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Walters Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Montelongo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Rivera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Rivera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶2 Our obligation in this appeal is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Osman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Osman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Our obligation is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Greathouse Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Greathouse Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Wiggs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Wiggs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 30, (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Moreno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Moreno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Lendsey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Lendsey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Cotham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Cotham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Patton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Pelayo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Patton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Pelayo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Montano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Montano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶2 Our obligation in this appeal is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
State v. Perkins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Bennett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Bennett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 278 (2000); ¶ 24 (App. 1999).
State v. Perkins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Mayes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Toledo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Mayes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶2 Our obligation in this appeal is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30
State v. Toledo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738; P.3d 89 (App. 1999).
State v. Kummer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Kummer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-36, ¶¶ 22- 24, -95 (App. 1999) (discussing proper method to achieve purpose of Anders appeal — to ensure indigent defendants receive equal and effective counsel in identifying arguable issues for appeal) (citing Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 81-83 (1988)).
State v. Valero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Valero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Our obligation is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Shumaker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Shumaker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶2 Our obligation in this appeal is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶2 Our obligation is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30
State v. Walsh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015