Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Clark, 2 P.3d 89.
- State v. Walsh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Moton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Faccio Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Faccio Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Robinson
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738; P.3d 89 (App. 1999).
-
State v. Moton
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
See Anders, 386 U.S. 738; Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); ¶ 30
- State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Richards Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Richards Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Taylor
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶2 Our obligation in this appeal is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30
- State v. Navarrette Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Navarrette
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 30, (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
- State v. Centeno-Sarabia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Jimenez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Laakmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Jimenez
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 30, (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
- State v. Centeno-Sarabia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Laakmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Penn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Penn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Jaramillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Jaramillo
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
See Anders, 386 U.S. 738; Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); P.3d 89 (App. 1999).
- State v. Wickham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Wickham
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Our obligation is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30
- State v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Hernandez
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
See Anders, 386 U.S. 738; Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); P.3d 89 (App. 1999).
- State v. Carrier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Carrier
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Counsel for Carrier filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), P.3d 89 (App. 1999).
- State v. Steinbrugger Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Steinbrugger Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Maestas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Maestas
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Counsel for Maestas filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), P.3d 89 (App. 1999).
- State v. Coven Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Coven
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶3 Our obligation in this appeal is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30
- State v. Ales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Ales
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶3 Our obligation in this appeal is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30
- State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Arnold Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Arnold Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Valenzuela-Valdez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Valenzuela-Valdez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Armenta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Armenta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Cabrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Buckley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Cabrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014