Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Clark, 2 P.3d 89.

1298 citing documents.

State v. Buckley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Lozano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Lozano Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Mata Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Mata Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Sutton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Sutton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 30, (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Morales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Cortez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Cortez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
See Anders, 386 U.S. 738; Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); P.3d 89 (App. 1999).
State v. Morales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Sutton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Green Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Green Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Sutton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Millanes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Beucler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Beucler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Millanes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶2 Our obligation in this appeal is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30
State v. Chee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Chee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Flores Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Flores Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Summers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Matzkanin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Matzkanin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 30, (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Summers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Zotigh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Zotigh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
See Anders, 386 U.S. 738; Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); P.3d 89 (App. 1999).
State v. Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Duran Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 30, (stating that this court reviews the entire record for reversible error).
State v. Duran Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Brain Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Brain Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶2 Our obligation in this appeal is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30
State v. Powels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Powels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
See Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 284-85 (2000); Anders, 386 U.S. 738; ¶ 30
State v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Alcantar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Portillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 30, (providing guidelines for briefs when counsel has determined no arguable issues to appeal).
State v. Alcantar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶2 Our obligation in this appeal is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30
State v. Portillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Lass Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Lass Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶2 Our obligation in this appeal is to review “the entire record for reversible error.” ¶ 30
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Counsel for Smith filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), P.3d 89 (App. 1999).
State v. Campos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014