Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Watson, 6 P.3d 752.

81 citing documents.

State v. Wilson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Wilson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Longhini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Longhini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Candace G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Candace G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 4 (App. 2000) (declining to address argument not raised in opening brief).
State v. Levesque Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Levesque Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 4 (App. 2000) (declining to address argument not raised in opening brief).
State v. Covarrubias Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Covarrubias Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Valdespino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Valdespino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Ramirez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Ramirez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Baker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Baker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Mueller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Mueller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Romero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Romero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 4, (citation omitted).
Founding Fathers v. Asbcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Founding Fathers v. Asbcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Lambesis v. Lambesis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Lambesis v. Lambesis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 4 (App. 2000) (stating that the court of appeals does not address arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief).
State v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Allen C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Allen C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Patron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Patron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See Continental Lighting & Contracting, Inc. v. Premier Grading & Utilities, LLC, ¶ 12, (providing that “legal theories must be presented timely to the trial court,” and if not, then they are waived on appeal); ¶ 4, (providing that appellate courts will not review issues not raised in the opening brief).
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Henderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Henderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Vasquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Vasquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Frank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Frank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Lua Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Lua Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶¶ 16-17, (declining to review for fundamental error when appellant failed to raise claim in trial court and failed on appeal to address whether alleged error was fundamental); ¶ 4, (arguments not presented until reply brief will not be considered).
State v. Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Vong v. Aune 328 P.3d 1057 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Vong v. Aune 328 P.3d 1057 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Heller v. Doe, 509 U.S. 312, 320 (1993); ¶ 7
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014